@[email protected] to [email protected] • 21 hours agoXenia doesn't like Systemddiscuss.tchncs.demessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1235cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1235imageXenia doesn't like Systemddiscuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to [email protected] • 21 hours agomessage-square46fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•16 hours agos6, dinit, openrc, BSD rc, are all alternative init systems with their own method of doing thing
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish3•11 hours agoAll of them are worse in my experience. In a embedded context I use busybox init and if I need something more I used systemd. Systemd actually has a fairly small footprint. A few years ago I ran it on a system with 32mb of ram.
s6, dinit, openrc, BSD rc, are all alternative init systems with their own method of doing thing
Guix_SD has its own init system, Gnu shepherd
All of them are worse in my experience. In a embedded context I use busybox init and if I need something more I used systemd. Systemd actually has a fairly small footprint. A few years ago I ran it on a system with 32mb of ram.