@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 days agoDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.commessage-square233fedilinkarrow-up11.71K
arrow-up11.71KimageDunning-Krugerlemmy.dbzer0.com@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 days agomessage-square233fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish21•1 day agoYou can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.
minus-squarebountygiver [any]linkfedilinkEnglish10•1 day agothat’s why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 day agoExactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.” We’d descend into a dark age for science.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•1 day agoExperts often disagree. If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.
You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.
that’s why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.
Exactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.”
We’d descend into a dark age for science.
Experts often disagree.
If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.