@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 1 year agoIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.commessage-square171fedilinkarrow-up1294
arrow-up1147external-linkIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.com@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square171fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•1 year agoInsanely frustrating how 50+% of this thread is people flatly arguing against a situation they just dont understand. Not even a disagreement of opinion, just flatly arguing about a topic that has nothing to do with turning right on a red light intersection.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoWell, people are arguing cases for different countries in the same thread.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoMan, I dont even mean different legal situations. So many people in here dont get what “right on red” means in a physical, moving sense.
Insanely frustrating how 50+% of this thread is people flatly arguing against a situation they just dont understand.
Not even a disagreement of opinion, just flatly arguing about a topic that has nothing to do with turning right on a red light intersection.
Well, people are arguing cases for different countries in the same thread.
Man, I dont even mean different legal situations. So many people in here dont get what “right on red” means in a physical, moving sense.