@[email protected] to Math [email protected]English • 1 year ago95.121% accuracyi.imgur.commessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up181cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up181image95.121% accuracyi.imgur.com@[email protected] to Math [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoThe screenshot displays 3 decimal places, which is the the precision I used. As it turns out, even just rounding to the nearest integer still requires checking more numbers than we even have the primes enumerated for (e^200 or 7x10^86)
The screenshot displays 3 decimal places, which is the the precision I used. As it turns out, even just rounding to the nearest integer still requires checking more numbers than we even have the primes enumerated for (e^200 or 7x10^86)
Ah, ok yeah that makes sense.