• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    I think the battery system that’s best for everyone would be user-replaceable batteries. That way you can have an extra battery on hand to swap in as needed, or even extra-capacity batteries that make your phone a little thicker for people who are okay with that.

    Those of us who do actually prefer thinner, lighter phones can still have them (maybe with a slight increase in thickness to accommodate the attachment mechanisms). Plus bigger batteries are a huge waste of resources if the capacity isn’t going to be used.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      826 days ago

      that was a thing in the early days. most clamshells had em and a few flat panels (called candybars)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        626 days ago

        First few galaxy phones. Pretty much all of the first few generations of smart phone except apple

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          126 days ago

          yep. first one i had with a non removable battery was the lg v30. battery was removable but you voided the warranty to do it and it required opening the entire case with a knife edge

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        In fairness the removable battery came with a pretty significant tradeoff.

        Water resistance.

        Many would happily take a reduction in water resistance for replaceable batteries, the problem is no one gives us the choice

        EDIT: inaccurate statement. Fairphone offers removable batteries

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          326 days ago

          There are phones that give you this choice. The Fairphones for example. The back cover is easily removable and you can pop out the battery like in the ol’ days. It has an IP55 as far as I know.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            That sounds sweet, I’ll consider Fairphone once my current android dies its not so noble death

          • CΓΔSΗ ΘVΞΓΓΙDΞ
            link
            fedilink
            126 days ago

            @sekki @copd if my device only cost around $500, that IP rating would be fine, but when you’re paying three times that, you want it to be fully waterproof, sorry, resistant.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              125 days ago

              I don’t know what a Fairphone costs where you live but where I live the Fairphone 5 starts at 550€ and the model with more storage and memory is 629€. That is no where even in the near of three times the price.

              • CΓΔSΗ ΘVΞΓΓΙDΞ
                link
                fedilink
                125 days ago

                @sekki I didn’t say it was. I said at that price, a lower IP rating wouldn’t bother me. My device cost $1,600 so it better have the best IP rating available.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              125 days ago

              For the kind of money flagship phones go for these days, I want that bastid waterproof down to 300 meters AND last a week.

        • CΓΔSΗ ΘVΞΓΓΙDΞ
          link
          fedilink
          226 days ago

          @copd @Sam_Bass here’s another aspect these people aren’t thinking about, wireless changing. That Qi pad is usually glued to the top of the battery or in some way attached that would make switching out batteries cumbersome at best.

          Most batteries also get through the day and the ones that don’t, usually have fast charging, which makes giving up your ingress protection to remove a battery, that much more silly.

          It’s not 2014. 😝

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      526 days ago

      At that point I think many would just get a decent powerbank. I’d prefer a larger capacity battery, 7000-10000mah even if the phone is slightly heavier and bigger. Especially for travel.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        926 days ago

        I disagree, swappable battery > power bank.
        Used to have a swappable battery. It was great, you could have like 3 of em and instantly be able to get back to 100% without having to be attached to a cord. I wish I could do the same for my SteamDeck now, it would be great :'(

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        yeah and with a swappable system with a couple battery sizes you could do that. and I could choose a slimmer battery.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I used to have a power bank case for an old phone that had a weak battery. Battery got low I would just turn on the power bank in the case and charge the phone. It doubled the thickness of the phone but I don’t think it really bothered me at the time. This was the Amazon fire phone from 2014? You could get them for $100 and get a free year of prime. I rooted it and installed some custom os on it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        yeah I agree those are a good option too, but that doesn’t solve the issue of replacing a worn out battery. that’s why I think we need swappable batteries.