Who needs human when you have AI :p

  • FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    I said:

    But if each time you train a new AI you reuse half the marbles from the first bucket again, you can have that blue marble show back up again in future AIs.

    The original bucket containing the blue marble isn’t going anywhere. It still exists. The blue marble will always be available to mix into future AIs. All you have to do is make sure you’re using some historical data (or otherwise guaranteed “human-generated”) along with whatever new unvetted stuff you’re using.

    • Dr. Jenkem
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      So then your back to locking LLMs to the year 2023. They’re usefulness is severely limited if you can’t train them on new data.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        All you have to do is make sure you’re using some historical data (or otherwise guaranteed “human-generated”) along with whatever new unvetted stuff you’re using.

        Emphasis added. Please read more carefully, this is getting repetitive. You keep assuming that the AI will be trained either entirely with old data or entirely with new data and that’s just not the case.

        • Dr. Jenkem
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          And what happens when “whatever new unvetted stuff” is primarily comprised of AI-generated content?

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Then the missing diversity comes from the non-AI-generated stuff that’s included in the mix.

            I’m not sure what the problem is here. The cause of model collapse when AIs are fed on the output of previous generations is that the rare “fringes” of the data are lost over time. The training data becomes increasingly monotonous. Adding that fringe data back in should cure that.