• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    By that logic, why bother with democracy and not trial by combat?

    The problem with your logic is that you assume jurors don’t have a sense of ethics and justice. If they truly don’t, then forget the judiciary as a problem, because the society itself isn’t going to hold up. So in that way, applying your logic here and under that assumption you are right, why bother with democracy and not trial by combat when people no longer care about acting in good will?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 hours ago

      you assume jurors don’t have a sense of ethics and justice

      I’m not assuming that at all. Jurors have a very specific role, which is to determine whether the evidence against a defendant is sufficient to find them guilty of the charges against them. That does not require a sense of ethics and justice.