• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    576 months ago

    The title is not entirely correct. They don’t plant to “introduce” conscription. Germany had conscription from its formation of the Bundeswehr in 1955 until it was put on hiatus in 2011 because people back then thought that Ivan was no longer a problem. So what they think about is not “introducing” but just reactivate it.

    The changes will be that while before 2011, conscription was only for men, it is planned to be for both sexes, and military service will no longer the one preferred service (back then, you had to go through quite some hoops if you did not want to serve in the Bundeswehr and do your time in e.g. social services). This time, the military option is just one of several that can be chosen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      At this stage it’s all hot air. Nobody has even started talking about how to finance it and the defense minister isn’t even 100% sure he will get his requested additional funds for the next cycle. When somebody asked him about the topic he replied that he isn’t categorically against it but he would have to finance (and restructure, as the necessary infrastructure for it has been degraded/scrapped) more important topics first.

    • Knossos
      link
      fedilink
      English
      746 months ago

      It isn’t just about the military. I’ve not read the article, but Germany suffers from not having enough people working in social services. This problem got worse after getting rid of conscription. You could either choose military service or social work.

      By reintroducing it, they hope to fill in some gaps.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        996 months ago

        “What should we do to get more people working in the health sector?”

        “Better pay and more manageable shifts!”

        “Roll back privatization to shift the focus to sustainability over profits!”

        “I’d just enslave the youth again.”

        [Employee 1& 2 get defenestrated for a change]

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              66 months ago

              That’s a great idea, but how much glass do you need to knock out of a window before it just becomes door.

              • qaz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 months ago

                Doors usually have something on the other side.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  Pedantically speaking… they don’t. And it may be difficult to draw a distinction between a window with a very low sill and a door with an extremely high sill.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              56 months ago

              Der Fenstersturzschein des TÜV ist für nur einen Fenstersturz gültig. Sie müssen die Fenstersturzmeldungstelle noch mal kontaktiert um einen neuen Schein zu bekommen, dann einen anderen Termin bei uns nachfragen. Schönen tag noch. HALLO NÄCHSTE BITTE

              Apparently not :(

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        136 months ago

        Yeah, instead of actually fixing the system and paying people normal wages, while also fixing the stupid education/certification system that social service workers need to go through, let’s just throw a bunch of teenagers at it, it will surely fix our problems!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        You could either choose military service or social work.

        Also some hospital work. Bedpan cleaning, etc.

        But it kept you out of the army, and took the strain off of hospitals and social services.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 months ago

      Probably that, and also gender equality. I’m not really in the favor of drafting, but it’s unfair that men have to go and women don’t.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    That is so sad, these kinds of times should already be over in humanity’s history. Why doesn’t anyone have a solution? Are the war mongering powers just waiting for the new nuclear deterrent? Future AI terminators pls just go straight to Russia/China/USA leadership and let the humans be

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      266 months ago

      It’s because the leaders aren’t the ones fighting the battles or being targeted. They’re playing chess somewhere far from the violence.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 months ago

        We should just solve conflicts by throwing the presidents or monarchs of the opposing countries in an arena to fight to death.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I think it’d be better if we disregarded highly authoritarian leaders in general and embraced socialism. Back in the day, kings and emperors fought their battles, but it didn’t make their feudalism any less… feudal.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 months ago

              Humans cooperated and formed large confederations long before capitalism and liberalism were ideas.

              It’s true that unequal and selfish organisations have often consolidated power and squashed other organisations but we’ve also seen humanity going the opposite way many times before.

              To shrug our shoulders and say humans are inherently greedy so socialism can’t work is a cop out. We’ve dismantled unequal power structures many times before and we can do it again

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Let’s say your country was about to be invaded, your house stolen and you sent elsewhere or killed so that citizens of the invading country could occupy your house and your land instead.

          And all of that not happening was hinged on the physical prowess of an old guy who’s probably been in politics for decades.

          How helpless would you feel?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          [T]he ministers and generals of the two countries, dressed in bathing-drawers and armed with clubs, can have it out among themselves. Whoever survives, his country wins. That would be much simpler and more just than this arrangement, where the wrong people do the fighting.

          - Kat, All Quiet on the Western Front

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            "Sorry ole chap, turns out all those cigars didn’t do Churchill any favors. Hitler took him out in under a minute.

            Anyway, we heard you’re gay, so here’s a bullet in your ear."

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          That would be interesting. We’d definitely have to shift who we elect towards more violent leaders tho, and idk how I feel about that haha.

    • DMBFFF
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      FWIW and AFAIK, the PRC doesn’t have conscription (while the ROC does).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        There’s also conscription in places which don’t attack others, because of an attack threat from a neighbor. I just hope that whatever helps humanity forward, goes to the root cause. Imperialist state oligarchs are a good start. And other billionaires

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is an unserious proposal. Germany spends about 1.5 percent of its GDP(*) on defence, much of it wasted, and increasing it to even 2 percent has involved painful and extended political wrangling. If the country collectively cannot find the will to tweak its budget to fund a modest increase in defence spending, it is not going to countenance universal conscription.

    (*) GDP, not budget; error pointed out by Enkrod

    • Enkrod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      236 months ago

      This is PATENTLY wrong. It’s 1.49% of GDP, not budget.

      Defense budget is 10.9% of the governments budget, it’s the second largest budgeted item after social wellfare and in front of infrastructure (which is crumbling) and debt. To increase it to 2% of gross domestic product means spending an additional amount equal to the entire budget for education and research.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 months ago

        Oh wow, this is the first time I see this difference mentioned. NATO really expects that much military spending?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Apologies for the mistake.

        But the point remains: 2% of GDP is the NATO target, getting even to that point for Germany has been like pulling teeth, and a serious implementation of universal conscription would be a much bigger ask.

    • AggressivelyPassive
      link
      fedilink
      English
      236 months ago

      It’s a serious proposal, but not as a universal conscription. It’s intended to only call everyone in for the health check and use that as a way to get young people interested in the army.

      There are different models floating around, the most serious being that everyone (including women) gets called in and you basically choose between civil service and army. The civilian side can ramp up slots rather quickly, the army doesn’t. So the army probably will ramp up over several years.

      Also, I wouldn’t call 100 billion € a “modest increase”.

      • volvoxvsmarla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 months ago

        To be honest, conscription aside, I think a gap year of civil service would be a good idea. It gives you a break from school - university - work, you don’t feel like you lost time since everyone has to do it, and you get into a mindset outside of your preplanned route, which might do you good.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          86 months ago

          I’m going to have to disagree. It’s forced labour, no amount of pretty words changes that. It’s also not a “break” if you have to work, and considering that you’d be unskilled and probably physical labour with no (simple) way for you to quit if faced with abuse, it probably won’t even be under good conditions or compensated fairly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 months ago

      To be honest, getting a majority to agree that the youth should do what most other generations did seems easier than taking money out of other budgets. Even before Russias attack there had been calls to make every young person do a year or Service for society. The plan was more socially beneficial back then but the sentiment of just ignoring what the younger generation wants isn’t new

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 months ago

      The draft has never been abolished in germany, it has only officially been ‘suspended’. Resuming it would be easy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          CoD 2 Tutorial Russian Campaign vibes. Throwing potatoes to train throwing grenades incoming.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Legally yes it would be easy. Practically we do not have the infrastructure anymore for it.

        Heck iirc the state doesn’t even have the capability to know who would need to be drafted anymore.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    166 months ago

    In the USA I had to sign up for the draft when I came of age, but luckily the draft system hasn’t been utilized since 1973.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I always thought conscription had benefits. Tidy up the youth, teach them teamwork, toughen them up and give them self-reliance, will really help with the obesity problem.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The best argument for conscription is that, like politics or the police, the psychology predisposed to choosing it is not necessarily the most beneficial to be involved with it.

      If you could choose to serve only in natural disaster relief, humanitarian, or aid operations it would make it significantly less conflicting.

      Ultimately the requirement to be involved with, and potentially murder, in anti-democratic or anti-humanitarian operations, and acts of aggression, that could have been decided entirely by self-serving corporate or political interests makes conscription a dealbreaker.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        As someone said above:

        Draft soldiers of Germany are not allowed to operate outside of our own borders and are used to fill the gaps that stem from professional soldiers working abroad. The Bundeswehr and especially the draftees can only be used for peacekeeping, humanitarian aid and defense.

        Which seems fairly reasonable to me

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Starship troopers style. Interesting.

        Also with conscripts they don’t normally see fighting they are just normally ready. They tend to just be trained reserves.

    • RBG
      link
      fedilink
      English
      186 months ago

      Haven’t heard a stronger backwards boomer opinion in ages. Gheez…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      146 months ago

      Nothing gives people self-reliance like training them to do exactly as they are told, nothing more, nothing less and god forbid they develop a thought of their own on an issue and consider voicing it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      Do the army even want a bunch of nerds, theatre kids, goths and bisexual disasters - speaking as someone who was all of those as a teen - in the army? I thought the army liked people who shut up and ran around a field.

      “Oh if you don’t they put you in jail”

      ok how is that good for society?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        It’s not good at all for society. It’s slavery with the addition of a heightened risk of death, all to serve the whims of guys in suits far from the battlefield.

        Previous commenter thinking it’s a good thing because it will whip the rabble into shape is delirious. These are peoples sons and daughters that we would be sending off to die in the mud. Shameful.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          even if they never see war and just do a bunch of calisthenics in a muddy field - it’s still being yelled at rudely to do push-ups instead of… working a job? Being in education?

          I have absolutely no issue with OP being in the army - a good friend of mine was in the Signals. I respect him, but also, it would’ve done most of the people I know no good at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        I wasn’t saying it for the good of the army I was saying it for the good of the people.

        The army will get the best out of them that they can. Sounds like they could do with it more than most.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          76 months ago

          why can’t I decide what’s best for me? ages 18-21 I worked for my local city in projects designed to get local young people at risk of offending into projects like (legal) graffiti, music, arts, sports and volunteering.

          Surely that was a better benefit to society than learning how to walk in the same rhythm as a group of other people?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Same reason we don’t let kids decide if they want to go to school or not. Not everyone is going to make the right choice. People do things for their and societies good. You really don’t think most people are currently doing that can you?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              46 months ago

              but we let these “kids” choose their degrees, or jobs and - indeed potentially train them for the military - at that age.

              And who is to say the military is the right choice? If someone yells at me to do push ups in the mud - in any other context I am well within my rights to tell them to fuck off. Which is entirely normal behavior.

              In general, yes, the majority of people are doing some kind of good for themselves, families and communities. People volunteer, raise kids, donate to charity, recycle, care for sick relatives, help their neighbors and friends…

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I think your right.

                As much as the fat kids and the kids that have no will power and blame their lack of drive on others could benefit from structure, teamwork and exercise.

                You’re right, ultimately it is too late and it just trying to fixing a failing of the state. We need to give these people more attention in school and turn them into better people than what we turn out of schools currently.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  36 months ago

                  it’s interesting to me that you see childhood obesity as “an absence of military training” and not such things as

                  • lack of support for health education in schools
                  • lack of health meal choices for school cafeterias
                  • lack of free support materials for parents
                  • subsidies and support for low income families to get access to fresh and healthy foods
                  • tariffs on high fat and high sugar foods
                  • regulation on grocery store prices
                  • more free activities for young people
                  • subsidized sports programs and facilities
                  • etc etc

                  “oh that’s expensive”

                  the us military spends $64,000 per second every second.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        226 months ago

        Currently, just barely under half of Germany’s population is overweight.

        That’s only ten percent less than the USA, which sits at 57%.

        And yes, it causes massive health problems, staining the healthcare system.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    i don;t like conscription into the military but i’ve always felt some sort of manatory non-military civil or social service or peace corps participation would do a lot for encouraging civic participation in exchange for some sort of universal educational system or some form of reimbursement for secondary education.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      In this day and age it feels like a McDonald’s worker could ai copilot a drone better than the folks over in Israel, so no I totally disagree with conscription without certain safeguards in place to prevent genocide or other dumbfuckery.

  • Amoxtli
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Germany needs to draft soldiers to go to Ukraine as soon as possible and help the Ukrainians, because it is the right thing to do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      206 months ago

      Draft soldiers of Germany are not allowed to operate outside of our own borders and are used to fill the gaps that stem from professional soldiers working abroad. The Bundeswehr and especially the draftees can only be used for peacekeeping, humanitarian aid and defense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      136 months ago

      As much as I would like to see Russia get shitmixed by a proper first world army (not that Ukraine hasn’t been doing phenomenally), I think that might actually put putin in a corner.

      Ideally we’ll just keep giving Ukraine equipment and propagandize how hard they’re kicking russian ass and sanction the hell out of Russia until the people and oligarchs lose their appetite for Ukraine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      How about our military stays between our own borders. Let those that want to go go. But don’t force a bunch of our youth to go fight someone else’s war.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        I bet you could find a bunch of people saying this almost word-for-word as Hitler took Czechoslovakia.

      • Amoxtli
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        If you don’t fight the Russians in Ukraine, you will be fighting them in Germany. Don’t say you weren’t warned.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    106 months ago

    Well, the main opposition party wants that… Sooo… Maybe in the future, maybe not…