• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    So has this community been completely taken over by lefties? I assumed that was going to happen eventually anyway.

    I don’t need another community that shits on conservatives. That’s 100% of Lemmy. It’s pretty much its foundation.

    Edit: damn. Really upset some folks with this one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Is the point of the community to promote conservativism or to discuss it? Conservatives aren’t banned from other Lemmy communities, I don’t see any reason to ban non-conservatives from this one.

      Besides it’s probably not so much that the community has been “taken over” but that conservative dogma shows low survivability in the presence of alternative ideas, hence the need for conservative safe spaces like Fox News and truth social. I mean really posting Trump bootlicking by Jonathan Turley is just not going to compete in a free marketplace of ideas.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      810 hours ago

      Reality has a left leaning bias. If that upsets you there are plenty of echo chambers you can sit and cry in.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      1011 hours ago

      Oh yea because conservatives don’t have full blown corporate social media conglomerates dedicated to OwNInG tHe LiBs

      And you want to complain about a comm becoming a conservative parody meme comm on the Lemmy-verse who hasn’t even cracked 50k MAUs‽ LMAO, but its the left who are “snowflakes” lololol

    • @fitjazz
      link
      39 hours ago

      Make sure to let the door hit you on the way out.

    • Amon
      link
      fedilink
      510 hours ago

      I think you’d fit in better on truth social.

      After all the first instance is .ml!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      711 hours ago

      Probably hard to find a home when you’re an evil disgusting piece of shit. Ah well, get fucked loser.

  • TooManyFoods
    link
    fedilink
    281 day ago

    Here’s the thing. They kind of do have socialism. The government has a controlling interest in their biggest industry. They also have a government that is very responsive to the people. I’d argue they have one of the most successful examples of socialism in the world.

    They don’t advertise it. I’ve seen a right wing guy identify them as such, and then praising the Anders attack from 20 years ago as punishment for their socialism. I think it was the chinless guy who follows Theil around.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      710 hours ago

      The Norwegian government has 60 to 70% of the shares in Equinor, and all oil companies on the Norwegian continental shelf had to provide daily and monthly drilling and boring reports, and the companies are taxed heavily.

      Source: worked on the software that was used for these reports, and I’m Norwegian.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1313 hours ago

        hmm … know who else has a lot of oil… somewhere verrrry close to you… you might even be standing on it.

        wait, are you saying that we should nationalize the US oil industry to achieve socialism?

        I agree!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        20
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Imagine naming yourself SpaceCowboy, but not understanding that Cowboy Bebop is an obvious critique of capitalism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            911 hours ago

            The sign-off to almost every show for Cowboy Bebop is “See you, space cowboy.” They call bounty hunters in the story cowboys. He’ll, it’s in the danm name of the show.

            In Firefly, however, while it is a western themed space sci-fi, none of the characters are cowboys.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              49 hours ago

              Firefly is the top result when I search “space cowboy show” and I do seem to recall an episode where they transported cattle; but, I have to agree that calling them cowboys is an exaggeration on my part.

              The IMDB link is for a movie literally called Space Cowboys. The general point is that the theme is not exclusive to one show.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            621 hours ago

            Ah yes, Steve “[the left is] as unpleasant as the people on the extreme right” Miller. That clears things up nicely.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        In the early 20th century, about 50 years before Norway discovered oil, they were already per capita among the richest countries in Europe. This was because of their culture of land and resource sharing.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        422 hours ago

        Norway’s oil profit all goes to their sovereign fund and does not enter their national budget.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    401 day ago

    My second favorite kind of conservative:

    “Let’s do a UBI instead of all this commie welfare stuff! But also lower billionaire and corporate taxes to zero! Why won’t someone do something about inflation?”

    • Album
      link
      fedilink
      281 day ago

      “If we don’t cater to the billionaires they will leave and take their money”

      Oh no… Please… Don’t go. Noooooo…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        it’s a myth anyways. Gary Stevenson talks about it. ultra rich people are rich because they own physical assets that society (businesses and individuals) must pay them to rent or use. you don’t have to be a resident of a place to invest in it, you can drop cash into places from anywhere. in other words, where money gets invested is NOT dependent on where the investor lives.

        it’s naive to think that a billionaire who leaves the country will just walk away from say, a lucrative oil drilling operation or a supermarket chain or a new skyscraper or a data center… simply because they don’t live there? even if they choose to avoid US opportunities, other investors will come along to snatch it up.

        billionaires can change countries and move anywhere in the world, but they can’t take a stadium or an office building or a football team with them. the productive resources (factories, shops, commercial buildings, apartments) that enable wealth generation and contribute to gross productive capacity each quarter, aren’t portable.

        the physical resources and tools of production will still be here, the parasites who extract rents from them will not. besides, plutocrats don’t pay any income or wealth taxes, so it’s no net loss whatsoever.