- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
TFA: Greta Thunberg and four co-defendants have been found not guilty of breaking the law when they refused to follow police instructions to move on during a climate protest.
District Judge John Laws threw out a public order charge due to “no evidence” and added police attempted to impose “unlawful” conditions during a protest.
Oh so they’re like to charge the cops for trying to impose unlawful conditions right? right?
I hate the cops as much as everyone but thats not what the ruling says at all.
The case was thrown out not because the cope were doing anything illegal, but because their instructions to the protestors were so unclear they couldn’t be considered a lawful order.
As well as the fact that the incompetent cops didn’t take statements from anyone so there’s no evidence to prove they violated section 14.
Honestly part of me suspects the cops might have did it on purpose because they were ordered to stop it but didn’t really want to. But that’s probably giving them too much credit honestly, incompetence is the most likely answer.
oopsy woopsy we made a little fucky boingo that dragged you through the criminal justice system through no fault of your own and at no cost to us, all because of an unknown mix of malice and incompetence
oh well 🤷
Well there is a law that they were in theory breaking.
A shitty authoritarian law, but still a law.
And the whole point of the criminal justice system is to interpret cases like these and interpret the law and decide if someone is culpable. This is what happens when you have a properly separated system where cops are not judge joury and executioner, so while cops need to have some understanding of the law, its not their job to make those finer interpretations when cases could or could not be illegal. It might seem dumb in this case, but if cops have that power it would allow them to selectively enforce the law and you would have them saying “oh I didn’t arrest the rapist because of this [nonexistent] technicality that makes it not a crime”
your argument is that the police need to be allowed to act with as much malice or incompetence as they like because if there was more oversight in the system they could choose to not arrest rapists?
you’re saying that more oversight would lead to the police having more freedom to enforce the law as they see fit?
No. And I would rather you didn’t purposefully misinterpret what am saying for the sake of trying to “win” a pointless internet argument like a redditor would.
you’re the one attempting to reframe “there should be more oversight on the police’s actions” as “the police should be granted more power to interpret the law as they see fit”
the cops might have did it on purpose because they were ordered to stop it
Yep.
The UK gvmt have been increasingly cracking down on the right to protest. For example, during the proclamation of Charles coronation (royal officers go to towns and read an official proclamation out loud) a man who said (direct quote) “Not in my name” was arrested on a public order offence and dragged through the system until the CPS said they weren’t going to take it any further.
At every turn the current Tory gvmt have urged the Police to be heavy handed with public order ‘offences’ and sort it out later.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
acab
acab
acab
Removed by mod
Errico Malatesta’s “For The Higher Police Authorities” provides a very good summary of the state of the police:
That the Police are indiscreet, vexatious, evil and, when it happens, even brutal, is something that we understand: it is the profession that wants it. They have always been and will always be like that, in any regime: and therefore we must fight for their radical abolition and not for their reform. But do they really need to be also, and above all, stupid? It would seem so.
The Tuscans usually say: he who is born a fool is never cured [chi nasce bischero non guarisce più].
Once Depretis, attacked by Deputy Tajani, because there were a number of criminals in the police force, replied: “But who do you want me to put in, if the honest men don’t want to do that job?” If someone reproached Giolitti, who is a rascal but not an idiot, the ineptitude of his agents, he might reply: “But what can I do if intelligent men don’t want to be policemen?”
class traitors have no moral compass? Say it isn’t so.
Probably just incompetent more that anything
That’s a legal way to say
Greta Thunberg: Case thrown because of ‘bull shit argument made up by a stupid policeman’
District Judge John Laws…
Another case of nominative determinism at work?
john was born for this job.
Reject modernity, return to caste system.
I know a Simon Banks who works in a bank. Go figure
I had no idea what charge this was referring to. Here’s the important bit from the article:
Greta Thunberg and four co-defendants have been found not guilty of breaking the law when they refused to follow police instructions to move on during a climate protest.
The 21-year-old campaigner
It seems like she was just twelve or something yesterday. Damn, time slips by.
Removed by mod
Depends what county arrested her. She definitely needs to be careful about traveling to certain locations.
Removed by mod
?
Removed by mod
aaaaahh… how did the little girl hurt you mate?
because a little girl supporting ‘everything anti-western’ really just wants to stop dumbfucks from fucking up our atmosphere more. you should want that too.
you know picking on a little girl is a pretty lame look right? when she’s literally on the right side of history?
everything anti-western… woof.
Removed by mod
I agree she has a point that climate crisis is a big issue.
honestly did not see that coming as everyone of her critics I’ve met have been hard-right drill baby morons.
but I can accept it into my reality and adjust my worldview. been all over the US and UK, some bits of asia - I haven’t seen evidence of western civilization falling any time soon, regardless of the critiques of some kid.
The biggest threat to western civilization and coincidentally, humanity, is the enormous threat of climate change. Not nuclear war, not hypercapitalism, not even the downfall of american democracy - the largest looming threat is our ability to adapt to a planetary shift in weather that will kill people in large swathes. The remainder will flee.
That’s what the entire world, including the western world, should be focused on - and if they were, they’d easily be above her critique.
They are not.
Further: western civ needs a ww2-scale crash effort world wide to eliminate CO2. Eliminate racing, eliminate coal rolling, any motor sport that isn’t run electric on renewable energy from snow-mobiles and watercraft to pleasure cruising, mandate emissions testing country wide, crank the price of hydrocarbons in every avenue way up. Probably limit/eliminate 2 stroke engines (some can be fiendishly efficient but they don’t represent the galaxy of shitty ones out there spewing oil and unburned fuel). And a thousand other things.
If we did it today, I’d give us 50/50 of surviving.
We’ll be lucky to see those kinds of changes by 2050, knowing western civilization. But please focus on the kid.
I mean there were few options for a guy named “John Law” other to become a judge right?
Good work Greta!
Hah, get fucked polluters.
Public execution for any cunt cops overstepping the law.
That…doesn’t look like Greta at all. Oof, what happened to her? She used to look better
Absolute wild comment to make about someone who looks like a normal 21 year old
Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn’t work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: [email protected]
Keep making them roll that dice
