• 3.17K Posts
  • 552 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle

    1. One moderator from fosstodon is not 100% aligned to the prevailing ideology on Fedi.

    For clarity’s sake, the views the mod expressed were:

    • Calling criticism of Mahmoud Khalil’s arrest and transfer to Louisiana “yellow journalism” for using the phrase “disappeared”
    • Defending the striking down of a school privacy policy that requires teachers get consent from LGBTQ+ kids before outing them to their parents
    • Removing posts about surveillance of LGBTQ+ people in r/privacy for contradictory or unexplained reasons
    1. The mob went on to presume that someone that is not 100% aligned to their prevailing ideology is unfit to be considered human - let alone a moderator - so they went after the admins.

    Is all criticism now a “mob” just because they don’t want people with anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ+ views to have the power to censor others?

    1. The admins claimed to have reviewed said mod actions, didn’t find anything out of the ordinary, but still got rid of them.

    From what I saw, the admins actually said that they were fine with keeping him on the moderation team and the mod deleted their own accounts

    1. Less-principled users of fosstodon are now just leaving the instance, for fear of being associated with them.

    Are they? The most I saw was that people were considering leaving because other instances were going to start blocking Fosstodon

    What is with the concealing and downplaying of the mod’s views and then exaggerating the “outrage” of the “mob”? Yes the Fediverse can be drama-prone but most of the fanning of the flames seems to be coming from the people complaining about Fedi users genuine criticisms of the mods/admins on Fosstodon

    I don’t think it’s unreasonable to remove mod privileges for these kinds of views if you’re trying to run an inclusive space. There’s supported suspicion that they’ve used their mod powers to censor information on minorities already, just because they haven’t done it yet on this platform doesn’t mean you let them lie in wait to do it. Makes me worry that Fosstodon admins don’t see any issues keeping someone like that around

    Would this get the same kind of backlash had the mod been kicked out for tankie views?






















  • Except they haven’t actually backed that up with a way for you to jump servers. If the central Bsky server goes down, it takes the network with it. Until they actually let other people host, it’s just meaningless posturing. Without a way for people to leave their network you are as captive there as you are on Twitter







  • I feel like the opposite, while Opal was the straw that broke the camel’s back here, there are a lot of less powerful decks that heavily depend on it (Affinity, Asmo Food, Lantern Control, Hardened Scales, Hammer Time) whereas Breach is really only necessary in Breach combo decks. It occasionally gets used in Prowess or Ruby Storm but more as a flex card. It’s also just a busted card banned in several places anyways, it’s not like it’s a fair card taking the fall for something else.

    I feel like it worthwhile to at least see if Opal can stay unbanned without Breach in the format, and if it continues to be a problem hit it on the next list