• 265 Posts
  • 5.13K Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年7月11日

help-circle



  • 🙂 Daily Quordle 1203
    8️⃣9️⃣
    5️⃣🟥
    m-w.com/games/quordle/
    ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩
    ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩
    ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
    ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩
    🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
    ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩
    ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩
    🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩
    ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    
    ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
    ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
    ⬜🟩🟨🟨⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨
    ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
    🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
    ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
    ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
    ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
    ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜
    

    I’ll see myself out










  • I’m in the second one, but instead of the first one, I joined the My Parents thought I was just lazy and worthless and did everything they could to make me feel bad about it, and when that clearly didn’t work, they doubled down on the same strategy even harder, and now I am triggered just being in the same room with them from the PTSD they gave me Club. It’s honestly not a great club? I do not recommend joining.








  • Hey friend. Calling the Venera probes “junk” is selling them short. The Soviet Venus program pulled off some genuinely insane feats between the ’60s and early ’80s—basically the punch-card era of spaceflight.

    • Venera 7 was the first spacecraft to land on another planet and send data back (1970).
    • Venera 9 delivered the first photo taken from the surface of another planet (1975).
    • Venera 13 survived 450°C heat and 90 atmospheres of pressure in 1982, long enough to send back color photos, audio from the surface, and a full soil analysis. No other country—not even now—has matched that on Venus.

    All of this was done with computers running at 100–200 kHz and 8 KB of memory. For comparison, modern smartphones have 3–6 GB of RAM, multi-core CPUs clocking in at 2.5+ GHz, and literally millions of times the processing power. Your phone wouldn’t last five seconds on Venus. Venera 13 lasted 127 minutes.

    Despite the harshest planetary environment we’ve ever targeted—900°F surface temps, atmospheric pressure like 3,000 feet underwater, and clouds of sulfuric fucking acid—the Venera program still racked up a list of milestones:

    Here’s how their success rate compares to other space programs:

    Program Missions Successes Failures Success Rate Notes
    Soviet Venera 28 15 13 ~54% First landings, first photos, audio, and soil data from Venus
    NASA Venus (Mariner) 5 3 2 60% All flybys—no landings
    NASA (modern planetary) Many ~75–85% Varies ~75–85% Achieved after decades of experience and tech refinement
    SpaceX (Falcon era) 300+ ~98% Few ~98% Mostly low Earth orbit and ISS missions, not planetary landings

    SpaceX has incredible reliability, but they’re launching commsats and resupply capsules—not trying to drop hardware onto a planet that eats spacecraft for breakfast. NASA has never returned data from the surface of Venus, not ever, despite multiple attempts. Mars is a far easier target in every possible way, and it still took decades to achieve consistent success.

    Lest you think Venera’s 54% success rate was a sign of failure — it wasn’t — it was a sign of pushing the boundaries of what was possible. They were first. They were bold. And they made history with kilobyte-level hardware and pressure vessels tougher than your car’s engine block.

    This wasn’t junk. It was triumph.

    Visual and audio proof: