You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

    • Lemminary
      link
      fedilink
      55 hours ago

      The nuke is a bad example of the sheer power of the modern American military. It’s also a bit outdated. That legal mechanism was drafted when many other modern weapons and tactics were not even dreamed of. Just a couple days ago the US military announced its strongest armor yet.

      But I agree: your assault rifle may save you from others with an assault rifle, but it won’t do shit if the military comes for you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 hours ago

      That’s a non sequitur though, unless you’re suggesting a tyrant would nuke the population he wanted to rule.