The sorry state of streaming residuals shows why SAG and the WGA are striking.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          You said they got 3 billion as if they got 3 billion dollars. In reality Netflix paid for the rights to distribute a show and paid for the infrasture to stream 3 billion minutes of it in hopes that people keep renewing their subscription. It definitely made them a lot of money, but not 3 billion.

        • DosDude👾
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          If those 3 billion minutes were watched non-stop 24/7 for the paying subscribers it would make at least $486,111.11 for Netflix assuming the subscribers paid for the cheapest subscription at ~$7. That’s still a lot of money, but they also pay for their own upkeep, servers and much more.

          I know most people don’t have the cheapest subscription, and also that they don’t watch 24/7. But it puts into perspective that Netflix doesn’t earn that much on one series.

          To add: they also make their own shows and productions and they pay to put shows up on their service that are not their own productions. I don’t know what a show like suits will cost to be put on Netflix, since they don’t produce the show, but I’d imagine that’s not cheap. And I guess the writers get a percentage of the money earned on the selling of those rights (depending on the contract they have with the original studio)

          And the paying of the writers is in the hands of the studio selling the rights, not Netflix.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Yes, I agree with you. I’m saying assuming. I don’t think they’ll go… You know what? You’re right… We’re gonna start paying more. Something will have to give. I’m saying is there a diff business model?

    • eeeeyayyyy
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      3,000,000,000 * $15 (assumed Netflix plan/user) = $45,000,000,000

      Damn! Just for one show?!