• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 days ago

    I’m merely describing how the ballot was incapable of recognizing the majority position of “No Genocide”: There were no “No Genocide” options available on the ballot. One cannot rationally conclude that the majority wanted genocide simply because a genocidal candidate won the election: There was no “no genocide” candidate to vote for.

    If the ballot is a train, the stations on this line are at the sewage treatment plant, the garbage dump, a stagnant swamp, and a rendering plant.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 days ago

      The majority position was clearly pro genocide, hence trumps win. And as per the train analogy getting closer to the no genocide stop means not voting for the repubs, there was a better chance under Kamala.