• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    202 days ago

    I am not familiar with MacOS, but that seems like a nightmare. What is the purpose of these files?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      542 days ago

      the macos file browser, Finder, lets you set a background for a folder, move file icons around to arbitrary positions, other shenanigans. in order for this to work across systems on removable storage media and network mounts, they have this.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 day ago

          I don’t think the code is available for people to figure out whether there’s a reason or if it’s completely arbitrary.

        • Natanael
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 day ago

          In Unixy environments like Mac and Linux the application can’t always know what the mountpoint of a drive is so it’s not always obvious which root folder to put those index/config files in if it’s a portable drive or network drive. Some mountpoints are standard per each OS, but not everything sticks to the standard.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          92 days ago

          Maybe. There are many ways to move files and directories around without using Finder, at which point all indexed data about those files and directories will be stale. Forcing something as core as mv to update Spotlight would be significantly worse, I think. By keeping the .DS_Store files co-located with the directory they index, moving a directory does not invalidate the index data (though moving a file without using Finder still does). Whether retaining indexing on directory moves is a compelling enough reason to force the files everywhere is probably dependent on whether that’s a common enough pattern among workflows of users, and whether spotlight performance would suffer drastically if it were reliant on a central store not resilient against such moves.

          So, it’s probably a shaky reason at best.