No. They create derivations of content they consumed prior. Most of them will even post their “inspirations” along with their derivations. And no one gives a shit.
If is shit, then stop consuming it. (no movies, no comics, no series, no books, NO ART)
OR
If is worthless then anyone can easily do it. Just create that yourself, BUT without using a program who steal and mix-up previous artworks. You don’t need that, right?
There’s a fundamental difference between a person learning from other people, and machines learning from other people, because the latter can be copied infinitely. One person can only generate so much output, while the machine can be scaled horizontally.
Irrelevant Human exceptionalism. Just because something is copyable doesn’t inherently make it worse. Just as something being difficult to obtain doesn’t make it inherently better.
Artists do the same shit and demand money for it.
Demand money for their work? THE AUDACITY OF THEM BITCH, THEY SHOULD WORK FOR FREE.
Artists create original content.
No. They create derivations of content they consumed prior. Most of them will even post their “inspirations” along with their derivations. And no one gives a shit.
All art is derivative.
Other people have used the words you wrote in other contexts before, therefore you stole their words.
Oh God, so did I! I’m doing it right now! I’m going to jail!
If is shit, then stop consuming it. (no movies, no comics, no series, no books, NO ART)
OR
If is worthless then anyone can easily do it. Just create that yourself, BUT without using a program who steal and mix-up previous artworks. You don’t need that, right?
But ofk you work for free, right?
I don’t consume “art” from people who complain about AI “art” as I don’t buy furry commissions.
I don’t really. I don’t go to or buy any of those. Haven’t in decades. “Artists” like to think WAAAAAAY to highly of themselves and their work.
There’s a fundamental difference between a person learning from other people, and machines learning from other people, because the latter can be copied infinitely. One person can only generate so much output, while the machine can be scaled horizontally.
Irrelevant Human exceptionalism. Just because something is copyable doesn’t inherently make it worse. Just as something being difficult to obtain doesn’t make it inherently better.
“Irrelevant human exceptionalism”? Sorry I don’t want creatives to starve while a few rich people get ever richer.
Artists demanding money: “YOU BETTER PAY ME FOR THIS STUFF OR ELSE I’M GONNA… gonna… Idk, keep making it for free I guess?”