@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 2 days agodeepseeklemmy.mlmessage-square219fedilinkarrow-up11.11K
arrow-up11.11Kimagedeepseeklemmy.ml@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 2 days agomessage-square219fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 day agoAnd yet there’s still a carbon cost attached to eating said fish because you have to catch it. Plants always have a lower cost Regardless most aren’t catching their own fish and are eating farmed fish.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 day agoThat statement is not supported by fact or logic, it’s irrational. You are in a dogma. This is useless. It’s like arguing with a religious person “God exist” is their argument, and that’s it. This is the same. So, sorry, I’m out.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 day agoSays the guy who can’t understand the carbon cost of an animal is higher than a plant whose energy comes from the sunlight.
And yet there’s still a carbon cost attached to eating said fish because you have to catch it. Plants always have a lower cost
Regardless most aren’t catching their own fish and are eating farmed fish.
That statement is not supported by fact or logic, it’s irrational. You are in a dogma. This is useless.
It’s like arguing with a religious person “God exist” is their argument, and that’s it. This is the same. So, sorry, I’m out.
Says the guy who can’t understand the carbon cost of an animal is higher than a plant whose energy comes from the sunlight.