• Pennomi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    615 hours ago

    No doubt. I think an easy way to counter that is to put a “deliberation” time on legislation. I’m spitballing but maybe require two votes 3 months apart, and they must both agree (otherwise there’s a third tiebreaker vote another 3 months later)? That would help kill off the flash fire effect that a viral meme can create and focus more on fixing problems that occur over a longer period of time.

    I mean I’m no political scientist so I’d love to hear more about what methods are proven for direct democracy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 hours ago

      Making a second decision mandatory makes it harder to change existing laws. This can be a good thing in some cases, but not always. It increases conservatism (in that it’s harder to change things).

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 minutes ago

        No doubt. The goal is to make it harder for memes to affect the outcome of a decision.

        Another way to approach it is if a supermajority votes for something, no secondary confirmation vote is required. Eg. reproductive choice would easily pass with one vote because it has such widespread support.

    • @Big_Boss_77
      link
      English
      415 hours ago

      Was it… the Persians? Maybe? Anyway, they had to make two choices on any decision, once when drunk and again sober a few days later. If rhe choice was the same both times it was deemed a good idea.

      I have zero idea if this is fact, but it sounds similar to your idea.