@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 13 hours agoCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.commessage-square81fedilinkarrow-up1639cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1639external-linkCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 13 hours agomessage-square81fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish187•12 hours agoAn attack on science is an attack on us all. They are trying to erase science they dont agree with. This is Christian fascism - welcome to giliad. Anyone in the US please organise - join an anti religious influence group, protest, disobey. You must fight back.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish21•7 hours agoScience doesn’t need politics, politics needs science.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•4 hours agoscience needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•4 hours agoScience doesn’t need politics to tell what is what, it’s science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•5 hours agoNo it surely doesn’t. Politics can exist with no new science.
An attack on science is an attack on us all. They are trying to erase science they dont agree with. This is Christian fascism - welcome to giliad.
Anyone in the US please organise - join an anti religious influence group, protest, disobey. You must fight back.
Science doesn’t need politics, politics needs science.
science needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.
Science doesn’t need politics to tell what is what, it’s science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.
No it surely doesn’t. Politics can exist with no new science.
It can, but it shouldn’t.