• TacoButtPlugOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 month ago

      Oh. Sorry. I thought it was good to be able to both have farming land and solar power. Sorry for missing the mark.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          If only there was a very concise article to explain their test and control groups. I guess looking at the picture is good enough

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          121 month ago

          Because "In Denmark, it is common for trees, wooden fences and even plastic sheets to act as windbreaks for crops. “We thought, if we are going to do this, why not make these wind shelters produce electricity?” says Victoria.

          In other words, the solar panels aren’t taking away any crop space that wasn’t already taken for windbreaks.

          If you’re used to a giant field of wheat with no protection from wind, it’s a different equation. (With climate change, possibly a Dust Bowl waiting to happen, but that’s another story.)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              10
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I don’t think the project was aimed at Iowa or Kansas. For one thing, they’re tornado country. You’d need to be able to retract the panels into the ground like missile silos or a 007-villain’s evil lair.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 month ago

          Not all crops need 100% sun exposure in 100% of their growing regions.

          Many crops do better with a little bit of well placed shading to help keep temperatures/sun damage down.

          The way these panels are oriented they may also reduce wind flow over the crops which can improve water retention (but may lead to other problems if crops are over-irrigated).

          Mathematically it’s entirely possible to have better crop yield than a vast expanse of monocrops devoid of shelter.

                • marmarka :sorioneku:
                  link
                  fedilink
                  61 month ago

                  @droporain you have made it very clear that its not an idea you would apply and your only contribution to the conversation has been lol look omg shitty idea

                  ok we get you, you dont see any utility

                  you dont add anything and only rebate what the rest are saying

                  what makes you think i have not read it and have found a case use where it helps me¿?

                  what would be your solution¿? how would you plant crops¿?

                  enlighten us please add something to the conversation

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              41 month ago

              From: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrivoltaics#Advantages

              Increased crop yield has been shown for a number of crops:

              Basil[46] Broccoli[47] Celery[48] Chiltepin peppers[49] Corn[50]/maize[51] Lettuce[52][53] Pasture grass[54] Potatoes[55] Spinach[46] Tomatoes[49] Wheat[56]

              Sheep grazing around solar panels in Australia produce a higher volume of wool, at better quality.[38]

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 month ago

          Plants don’t necessarily need as much sunlight as they get. More tends to be wasted and drys them out (thus wasting water). Growing in shade is actually better for many types of plants.