A project called “Remove-DEI” shows the tweaks used to remove “forbidden words” from a database about childhood school readiness.

The updates, shown in Github commits, are to a database for the Department of Health and Human Services’ Head Start program. They show a project called “Remove-DEI,” which reveal some of the back-and-forth that is happening behind the scenes to align federal agencies with Donald Trump’s executive orders that forbid almost anything having to do with race or gender within federal agencies. The Github pages show software engineers discussing amongst themselves how to best remove all instances of “forbidden words” from a specific database, and the code updates they used to do it. The changes also show that, while thousands of government datasets are disappearing from the internet, even ones that remain are having parts of their utility deprecated or broken in a way that may not be visible to those outside the government.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13518 hours ago

      This is being done by trump and musk.

      Microsoft just own the company where this is being discussed because the people actually doing the work are treating it like any other software project.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8418 hours ago

          I think you’re missing something here.

          GitHub isn’t doing anything. It’s just a repository where people can track changes that are happening by end users. The end users are using GitHub and are removing DEI stuff from their products at the direction of the US government (AKA. Musk and Trump).

          Being angry at Microsoft is like being angry at a grocery store chain because you saw a kid being told by his grandpa to feed stale bread (from that grocery store) to some ducks.

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            317 hours ago

            Maybe, I’ll reread, I’ve something to do shortly that will take most of my day but I’ll come back tonight to this. Thank you

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1515 hours ago

              To add, GitHub is actually a great place to be making these changes, because with GitHub you retain history of the edits and prior versions. So after Trump changes his mind or loses power, the missing information can be brought back in fairly easily. Nothing is permanently lost.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                36 hours ago

                So after Trump changes his mind or loses power, the missing information can be brought back in fairly easily. Nothing is permanently lost.

                It’s funny they have absolutely no idea.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 hours ago

                  Revert a 4 year old commit without dealing with conflict hell? I sure wish them luck

                  They should just revert every single change since this commit. That will role back all 4 years of Trump’s enshitification.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  68 hours ago

                  Most of these pages probably don’t change for years. And maybe not explicitly "revert"ing the change, but they’d know where to go back and find the text used for DEI stuff.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                215 hours ago

                Missing information being brought back? Assuming they don’t destroy backups. Assuming there are backups.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  38 hours ago

                  It’d take extra effort to remove the Git diff history, and I don’t think higher ups would know or the lower downs would care, lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5018 hours ago

          Excusing what? Someone called out the “free speech absolutist” hypocrisy. You assumed they were talking about Github or Microsoft for some reason. I corrected you.

          Maybe learn how to contribute to a conversation?

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            118 hours ago

            And people discussing it are employed by musk?

            • TJA!
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1917 hours ago

              The people that are discussing it are exposing it and showing what is happening. And the tools provided by GitHub are helping.

              So your original comment was celebrating Microsoft?

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Are you too stupid to understand the difference between hosting software source code and modifying it?

          Microsoft/github are not the ones making changes through commits.