• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    36
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Oh he’s awful alright. He’s a notoriously soft interviewer who gives his large platform to misinformation, but he also pressed Trump over “having the election stolen,” and agreed to disagree.

    That doesn’t mean anything to you or me, but it may add uncertainty to a brain dead Rogan/Trump follower.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1722 hours ago

      I also believe he cancelled on Kamala. Apparently she did agree to an interview and then he dropped her over “scheduling issues” but still had Trump come on.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1023 hours ago

      O wow, I didn’t watch the interview and have no intention to. I used to watch him when he had people like NDT and other science related people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1323 hours ago

        Even those can be a rough watch. Neil has a bad habit of speaking with conviction on topics outside his expertise, and Rogan just sits there saying “wow.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1221 hours ago

          That’s true, I have noticed NDT likes to step outside his field of study but at least he isn’t trying to politically motivate people to vote for fascist. So yea he has his flaws but at least he is pushing people towards science.