• ArchRecord
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3423 hours ago

    To anyone bemoaning BlueSky’s lack of federation, check out Free Our Feeds.

    It’s a campaign to create a public interest foundation independent from the Bluesky team (although the Bluesky team has said they support them) that will build independent infrastructure, like a secondary “relay” as an alternative to Bluesky’s that can still communicate across the same protocol (The “AT Protocol”) while also doing developer grants for the development of further social applications built on open protocols like the AT Protocol or ActivityPub.

    They have the support of an existing 501c(3), and their open letter has been signed by people you might find interesting, such as Jimmy Wales (founder of Wikipedia).

    • Net_Runner :~$
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 hours ago

      Ah yes, “free our feeds” where millionaire VCs are asking for donations

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 hours ago

      This is such a half-assed dog and pony show.

      They have millions in investment, why do they need someone else to fund this? Why don’t the bluesky team directly and materially support them?

      This is a core aspect of Bluesky’s marketing and they asking other volunteers to help make them rich.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Until there’s overt advertising its unlikely to enshittify the normal way. That doesn’t mean it won’t, just that a different capital process is at work. Wikipedia has outlived most of “web2.0” because its funded by donations and run by volunteers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 hours ago

          Until there’s overt advertising its unlikely to enshittify the normal way.

          Trust me we will be deep into that territory so fast it is going to make your head spin.

          Wikipedia has outlived most of “web2.0” because its funded by donations and run by volunteers.

          Private equity and VC funding can’t directly buy Wikipedia and dissect it because it is an at least somewhat functional non-profit organization. That is the only reason.

    • ZeroOne
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 hours ago

      The only thing the Fediverse is missing is way to migrate from 1 instance to another

      • ArchRecord
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 hours ago

        It actually does exist, at least on Mastodon, but is still very janky (e.g. old posts aren’t moved over due to “technical limitations”)

        Automatically makes people unfollow your old account and re-follow your new account, then makes your old instance’s link redirect to your new instance’s one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1521 hours ago

      I feel like the reason the reason why it’s taking off so much is because it’s not federated.

      It’s like people hear the term federation and they get afraid. I know it’s not that simple but still.

      In other words, people don’t know what they actually need.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        69 hours ago

        I don’t think 99% of people who have joined bluesky have any clue what federation is or means. They do know what “not twitter” is however.

      • ArchRecord
        link
        fedilink
        English
        918 hours ago

        I don’t personally think it’s because of that. Sure, federation as a concept outside of email has a bit of a messaging problem for explaining it to newbies, but… everyone uses email, and knows how that works. This is identical, just with it being posts instead of emails. Users aren’t averse to federation, in concept or practice.

        Bluesky was directly created as a very close clone of Twitter’s UI, co-governed and subsequently pushed by the founder of Twitter himself, who will obviously have more reach than randoms promoting something like Mastodon, and, in my opinion, kind of just had better branding.

        “Bluesky” feels like a breath of fresh air, while “Mastodon” just sounds like… well, a Mastodon, whatever that makes the average person think of at first.

        So when you compare Bluesky, with a familiar UI, nice name, and consistent branding, not to mention algorithms, which Mastodon lacks, all funded by large sums of money, to Mastodon, with unfamiliar branding, minimal funding, and substantially less reach from promoters, which one will win out, regardless of the technology involved?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        People are not afraid of the term “Federation.“ They literally have no clue what it is.

        It’s the instance concept I find consistently to be an issue. It’s an extra layer/barrier to entry. You don’t just create an account. You have to understand what an instance is and then determine which one you’re joining and what that means for your moment to moment usage of the platform.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          420 hours ago

          Yeah I was confused on if it was connected, if I was explaining it to myself id say that the fediverse has interconnected forums that all serve the same content and can be accessed by making accounts on different websites or apps.

          Lemmy, mbin, piefed, etc. are all ways to access the interconnected forum/threads side of the fediverse.

          Mastodon, sharkey, plaroma, etc. are all ways to access the interconnected microblogging slide of the fediverse.

          They all have different features, like mbin has account reputation, piefed has topics which let you sub to multiple related communities at once, etc., but the content is shared between those that serve the same type of content.

          Since they’re all built ontop of the same protocol ppl can always come in and build on top of it or make hybrids while still letting everyone access the same content. Like mbin having both microblogging (tweets) and threads, letting you post and view both from the same account/website.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            620 hours ago

            And it legit takes 5 minutes to sign up for 5 instances and see the differences, mine showed the same content for the most part, only lemmy.world was missing the piracy community, other than that it was all the same and any nervousness I had about it went away after seeing the feeds being the same.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              Yeah but people don’t want to set up 5 accounts to understand alt-reddit. They want to download a clean app that takes seconds to set up and just go. Friction is friction.

              Not everyone likes to tinker and poke and prod

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                39 hours ago

                Not only do I don’t mind multiple instances, I welcome it. It’s a feature for me, not a bug. But having to create multiple accounts is a no-no and what keeps people away. People say you only need one but that’s not true if you want to be active in multiple instances.

                If the fediverse had a way to unify account creation, that would be a game changer. It’s pretty much what’s holding the fediverse down, be it Lemmy, Pixelfed, PeerTube, etc. It’s frustrating because without that limitation I could see the corpos being given a run for their money.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  I think maybe I mis-conveyed my point. I love the way this is all structured. The problem is that it is not accessible to laymen at first glance. I tried the “it’s like email” approach and people’s eyes still just glaze over. They want to download an app, create their account, and jump into the action. Anything beyond that requires a lot of buy-in unless they are already somewhat technically inclined.

                  As I said in another comment, I find the simplest thing to do is just set up the account for them, pick out an instance for them and tell them what it is, and then once they’ve stuck it out and get their bearings then open the door a little wider and explain Federation, the nature of different instances, etc. My only goal is just to get them on at all.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 hours ago

                they should understand by the 2nd one, I just wasnt sure where I wanted to commit, it became fun by the 2nd one to pick an instance like a club

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                19 hours ago

                there really isnt much friction either if you dont cate about piracy otherwise id have stayed on lemmyworld when vyjr reccomended it, they really just need to try it, I complained until I tried it

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  But even then you have to explain the whole subscribed vs local vs all situation. Then defederation, so they know that there is stuff they can’t access without creating another account on another instance.

                  No matter how much we simplify it it’s simply not that simple. At least not compared to traditional social media. And we can sit here and call them lazy for not learning how it works or we can do more to try to meet people where they’re at.

                  What I’ve been doing lately is pointing people a good app like Voyager, tell them not even to think about an instance and just join the one I tell them to join (For instance I tell my queer friends to join blahaj), then as they poke around I started explain explaining more things.

                  It’s kind of like Linux. People obsess over their first distro and then they realize it’s really easy to swap distro’s. So usually I just tell people to get something very simple like mint or pop and just dive in until they learn what they actually want.