• Sibbo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 days ago

      Well, they could just require publishers to share the ad revenue.

    • MudMan
      link
      fedilink
      112 days ago

      Damn, I was coming here to say this is a meaningful curation step and I couldn’t give Steam my usual cynical reality check, but you found the angle and now I can’t unsee it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        262 days ago

        It can be both. Steam wants their cut, but they also don’t want consumers seeing a free game on Steam, downloading it, and then complaining to Steam because it’s not actually free, it’s just riddled with ads.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 days ago

        I don’t think it’s cynical. Their review model would make it very hard to make payment fair (we call always argue about whether Steam overcharges for its services) since it would be a pain in the butt to track income from advertisement.

        But the advertisement business model makes for worse games. I think it makes great sense for Steam to ban them. And if games on Steam are better then that’s good for game developers that use their platform.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        They could. That takes a lot more employees than they have and would mean that they were the place with all the shitty free games.