@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 month agoSeems like solid advicelemmy.worldmessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1649
arrow-up1649imageSeems like solid advicelemmy.world@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agoif males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 month agoBy disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up. The words you use are good, but the context is bad.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agoSo your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agothat’s realistically more achievable than the other way around
if males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.
The words you use are good, but the context is bad.
So your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
that’s realistically more achievable than the other way around