• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    244 days ago

    It doesn’t seem that this bill does that.

    I think it’s taking power from agencies like the fda and fcc. It doesn’t say anything about the courts.

    But I might not understand everything perfectly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Most of the judicial branch’s effective power comes from precedent: the court rules on one case, and that informs other officials’ interpretation of the law in similar circumstances going forward. This order seems to replace judicial precedent with the president’s opinion as the basis for interpreting the law outside the courts, with the court now only able to override that opinion on a case by case basis.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      124 days ago

      That still reduces the executive to “just following orders” which is a principle that’s not accepted anywhere that follows the rule of law.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        53 days ago

        anywhere that follows the rule of law

        That’s the beautiful part, apparently that no longer applies to the USA.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          43 days ago

          Did it ever?

          America signed the Rome Statutes, but never ratified it, and eventually withdrew entirely. They wield “international law” like a whip, but don’t subscribe to it themselves. America is the epitome of rules for thee and none for me.