• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    283 days ago

    It would be nice to hammer a manually created fingerprint into the browser and share that fingerprint around. When everyone has the same fingerprint, no one can be uniquely identified. Could we make such a thing possible?

    • Not really. The “fingerprint” is not one thing, it’s many, e.g. what fonts are installed, what extensions are used, screen size, results of drawing on a canvas, etc… Most of this stuff is also in some way related to the regular operation of a website, so many of these can’t be blocked.

      You could maybe spoof all these things, but some websites may stop behaving correctly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 days ago

        I get that some things like screen resolution and basic stuff is needed, however most websites don’t need to know how many ram I have, or which CPU I use and so on. I would wish for an opt-in on this topics: So only make the bare minimum available and ask the user, when more is needed. For example playing games in the browser, for that case it could be useful to know how much ram is available, however for most other things it is not.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 days ago

        No it isn’t.

        And this is really important. If you go on Google tracked websites without tor, Google will still know it’s you when you use tor, even if you’ve cleared all your cookies.

        Tor means people don’t know your IP address. It doesn’t protect against other channels of privacy attack.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            93 days ago

            It’s been a long while since I looked, but I remember it being a thing in tails to specifically not resize your browser window or only have it full screen to match a ton of other fingerprints.

            Plus since it was a live distro that reset on every reboot it would only have the same fonts and other data as other people using tails. Honestly, I hate that all that info is even available to browsers and web sites at all.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 days ago

                I don’t quite understand – does this feature let you resize the window again to the size you want, and you are still sharing the same fingerprint with everyone else? Or do you still have to keep the browser window the default size to minimize your unique fingerprint?

                • Forbo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 days ago

                  It rounds the browser window to the nearest 100x100 window size. Using the default will likely be the biggest dataset to hide yourself in, but maximizing the window will still have some amount of obfuscation.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 days ago

              Good point, that difference does matter. I guess other browsers like Brave use the Tor Network, and it would be misleading to suggest Brave has good anti-fingerprinting.

              What kind of fingerprint avoidance are you suggesting then that the Tor browser cannot do that makes a difference?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 days ago

                If you enable JavaScript, you open Pandora’s box to fingerprinting (e.g. tracking mouse movements, certain hardware details, etc). If you don’t, half (or more) of the internet is unusable.