• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    392 days ago

    Well, I’m still skeptical, but I have far more trust in France’s reporting than Chinese claims.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        Yeah, just like all that anti-white sentiment towards the US because we elected a president who almost passes for off-white.

        Though I suppose there could be other reasons if we dig deep enough.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        China: Spews blatant and obvious lies about everything that does or does not cast a shadow. Heavily censors any source.

        Some guy: I don’t trust information coming from China.

        China (and shills): That’s sinophobic!!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          224 hours ago

          Yeah. Surely we can believe the anti-China stuff! Our own government wouldn’t lie to us! /s

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            120 hours ago

            I never said “our” Government wouldn’t lie to us (unless you’re Chinese, in which case they definitely will). I just said that the Chinese government constantly lies, which is easily seen by anyone with eyes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 day ago

        China had a long history of fraudulent science that they need to dig out of to gain a good reputation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 day ago

          Because a shit ton of fraudulent science hasn’t come out of the US or Europe. Nope. No sir.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 day ago

          Nothing like the very highly reliable pharmaceutical “science” done in the US, amirite?

          Its not like we ever had “science” come from the US that said an extremely powerful opioid wasn’t addictive, amirite?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 day ago

          Do you know what “collaboration” means?

          It’s almost like they’ve got peers all over the world looking at their data!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            America doesn’t have a government. It’s a continent. Are you possibly referring to the USA?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 day ago

              In North America they teach that North America and South America are 2 separate continents.

              When someone refers to “America” in the contexts of countries they 9 times out of 10 mean the US. Since people from there usually call themselves “Americans” rather than “United statians”

      • Pika
        link
        fedilink
        English
        30
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        huh, I learned a few new words today

        for others who want to know

        • Jingoism: noun

          1. Extreme Nationalism characterized by a belligerent foreign policy

          2. A bellicose patriotism; aggressive chauvinism; belligerence in international relations

        • Bellicose: adjective

          1. warlike or hostile in manner or temperment

          2. inclined to war or contention

          3. warlike in nature/aggressive;hostile

        • Chauvinism: noun

          1. Militant devotion to and glorification of one’s country; fanatical patriotism.

          2. Prejudiced belief in the superiority of one’s own gender, group, or kind.

          3. Blind and absurd devotion to a fallen leader or an obsolete cause; hence, absurdly vainglorious or exaggerated patriotism.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              You don’t think uncritical and nationalistic dismissal of the “enemy’s” achievements as they must be both strong and weak has a place under “aggressive or exaggerated patriotism?”

              I guess that just makes them a racist then.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                72 days ago

                As far as I can tell by their comment history they are American, so I don’t know how is trusting France to be “nationalistic”. Or “patriotic”. Or aggressive, for that matter. Not a hint of militarisitc feeling either.

                I might be racist too, because I don’t trust what comes out of China as much as what comes from France. Or Germany. Or Switzerland. Or Japan. Or south Korea. Or Australia. Or India. Or Kenya. Yes, it must be racism.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    92 days ago

                    First of all, leave the goalpost where it was and re-read the definition of the word. Nowhere it mentions allies, friends, or the wife of your cousin’s neighbor. So on that you were dead wrong.

                    Second, if one trusts Japan or South Korea but not China… You say it’s because of racism. There is no aaaany other reason. Not at all? Really?

                    I love the little downvotes, I hope they help with your frustration. Keep them up!