What was John F. Kennedy referring to when he said “a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy”?

The President and the Press: Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961

Excerpt

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        He makes reference to it, but also speaks of some kind of opposition from “around the world” that was working on “expanding its sphere of influence”. He also described this thing as operating in secret, not out in the open. Was Russia operating secretly? (I don’t know much about the Cold War.)

        • Em Adespoton
          link
          fedilink
          1623 hours ago

          For those of us who lived through it, what he said was blatantly obvious at the time.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            19 hours ago

            There were people that assumed he meant Jews, but they were always going to think he meant that.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            422 hours ago

            Makes sense, I was too young to remember most of it. Still, does his description not strike you as resembling what we see happening in the U.S. today?

            • Em Adespoton
              link
              fedilink
              216 hours ago

              I disagreed with it at the time and do again now… there’s no grand conspiracy; people are just depressingly predictable in how they respond to economic and cultural pressures. Some people recognize the trends and attempt to ride them or even control them (or stop them), but with a few notable exceptions, history tends to just roll on regardless — which can look to some as if there must be some cabal of puppet masters calling the shots.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                112 hours ago

                Sorry, do you mean you disagreed with what JFK was saying, that you didn’t believe him?

                • Em Adespoton
                  link
                  fedilink
                  311 hours ago

                  I believe his observations were mostly correct, but wouldn’t tie it as closely to a “group” as he did.

                  • @[email protected]OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    111 hours ago

                    That’s amazing to me, that you were there to hear him and remember it. He’s one politician I would have loved to listen to firsthand. He seemed to say a lot of very controversial things, like when he spoke out against religious involvement in politics and named the religious groups very specifically… he was either really dumb or very brave… I imagine the latter. So do you think in this case he was maybe a bit too paranoid, or just mistaken?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          422 hours ago

          Yes they were operating in secret. There are many examples of their infiltration, such as the Cambridge Five.