• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        She is a terrorist in the worlds largest terror organization which kills the most amount of civilians worldwide by a large margin.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 hours ago

            If a terror group starts firing people to replace them with nepotistic appointments that means the organisation becomes less capable.

            The commenter said “deserved” but what this woman really deserves is jail.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              39 hours ago

              People don’t normally view serving in their country’s military as a war crime. By your standards 99% of anyone is who has ever been in any modern military should probably be in jail, and that’s not going to happen so why stress your little head about it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 hours ago

                “They are committing massive war crimes but they do not see it as a crime. Thus it does not count.”

                By your standards ISIS and IDF soldiers don’t deserve to go to jail either.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 hours ago

            The fact that she deserves it doesn’t imply things will get better after her getting fired, it just implies she’s a terrorist working for terrorists. Like, the name of the ship category you’re commanding is “Destroyer”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              39 hours ago

              Destroyers were classically ships that defended a larger group. They would fight submarines and other ship to ship threats in order to leave cruisers and aircraft carriers to their work.

              Destroyer was not, in it’s original meaning, focused on ship to land bombardment (that’s only part of the current generation because technology shrunk enough and nobody wants to spend a shitton of money on big boats anymore except the US)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                19 hours ago

                Yeah no, I’m not a military enjoyer in general, so idk what destroyer means or what’s the origin, I meant it more as a wordplay. But thanks for the clarification!