From the new terms:

When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 day ago

      Never trust them, they’re still lying on their FAQ

      Data collection still bugs me. Can I turn it off?

      Yes. User control is one of our data privacy principles. We put that into practice in Firefox on our privacy settings page, which serves as a one-stop shop for anyone looking to take control of their privacy in Firefox. You can turn off data collection there.

      You can’t just turn off data collection by opt-out through this option :-/

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 day ago

      Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data“)

      It’s killing me x)

    • Redjard
      link
      fedilink
      121 day ago

      Search for firefox-tou.
      The presence of that now magically removes mentions of privacy and not selling user-data in multiple places.

      -    <p>
      -        Firefox is independent and a part of the not-for-profit Mozilla, which fights for your online rights, keeps corporate powers in check and makes the internet accessible to everyone, everywhere. We believe the internet is for people, not profit. Unlike other companies, we don’t sell access to your data. You’re in control over who sees your search and browsing history. All that and exceptional performance too.
      -    </p>
      
      +    {% if switch('firefox-tou') %}
      +      <p>Firefox is independent and a part of the not-for-profit Mozilla, which fights for your online rights, keeps corporate powers in check and makes the internet accessible to everyone, everywhere. We believe the internet is for people, not profit. You’re in control over who sees your search and browsing history. All that and exceptional performance too.</p>
      +    {% else %}
      +      <p>Firefox is independent and a part of the not-for-profit Mozilla, which fights for your online rights, keeps corporate powers in check and makes the internet accessible to everyone, everywhere. We believe the internet is for people, not profit. Unlike other companies, we don’t sell access to your data. You’re in control over who sees your search and browsing history. All that and exceptional performance too.</p>
      +    {% endif %}
      

      Difference here is Unlike other companies, we don’t sell access to your data.

      -    <h2 class="c-section-title">The best privacy</h2>
      +    {% if switch('firefox-tou') %}
      +      <h2 class="c-section-title">Always protected</h2>
      +    {% else %}
      +      <h2 class="c-section-title">The best privacy</h2>
      +    {% endif %}
      

      Pivoting from privacy to security in the tos.

      -      <li>
      -        <h2>{{ ftl('does-firefox-sell') }}</h2>
      -        <p>{{ ftl('nope-never-have', url=url('privacy')) }}</p>
      -      </li>
      +      {% if not switch('firefox-tou') %}
      +        <li>
      +          <h2>{{ ftl('does-firefox-sell') }}</h2>
      +          <p>{{ ftl('nope-never-have', url=url('privacy')) }}</p>
      +        </li>
      +      {% endif %}
      

      As you mentioned they will apparently sell your data under tos.

      Where does the tos apply and where the mpl now?
      They would have removed all those mentions of privacy entirely if the mpl had no use anymore, wouldn’t they?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      162 days ago

      It felt so weird to upvote this. Thanks for pointing that out, but also uuuuuuuuuuuuggggggggggghhhhhhhh

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 day ago

        Mozilla seemingly can’t help shooting themselves in the foot, but I refuse to use Ladybird given its leadership.

        …Also, although this is minor, LB effectively doesn’t exist, so of course it’s unblemished—it hasn’t had time to fuck up yet. Even the prettiest, sweetest organizations screw up in various ways. I see no reason to believe LB will be different in the real world, outside of announcements and fundraisers. Let them launch first, give them a year or two (Mozilla’s been at this for decades…) before deciding whether they’re fit to be Firefox Killer.

        That said, I’d love to be proven wrong. Even if only to have something I could point at, show to Mozilla, and say “Look. That could’ve been you. Where did things go wrong, and what will you do about it?”

        • @[email protected]M
          link
          fedilink
          41 day ago

          I don’t want Ladybird to be a Firefox killer, I don’t even think Mozilla will care, I just want another competitor in the browser market, and I have faith it will at least be as good as firefox and we’ll see from there

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 day ago

            It’s just a lousy, metaphorical title. The real Firefox killer already exists, and its name is Chrome. I didn’t mean to imply something about your expectations for Ladybird, my bad.