• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It works on things that operate on a logarithmic scale. It’s odd how many real-world things fit that mold that don’t intuitively seem like they would.

    Another factor promoting it in real-world data sets is that they often have restricted ranges that favor lower numbers. Days of the month, for example, only go from 1 to 31. There’s only one way for the leading digit to be 4, but there are eleven ways for the leading digit to be 1.

    Another type of data includes values of varying ranges, which also favors lower leading numbers. Street numbers start at 1 and go up, ending at some point within a fairly large range in the real world. All of these ranges will have their fair share of leading 1s. They will NOT all have a fair share of leading 2s (what if it ended before 20?), and as you go up it gets progressively less likely. So if you took all street addresses, you’d expect to see more leading 1s than 9s.

    Your theoretical dice roll is not such a case. You would expect a uniform distribution of leading numbers. This would hold true with a 99-sided die as well.

    • GigglyBobble
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      While that’s true with a 10-sided die 20% of your rolls will start with a one and all other digits only have a 10% chance.