• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15 hours ago

    Current games have a limit. Current models have a limit. New games could scale until people don’t see a quality improvement. New models can scale until people don’t see a quality improvement.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I’m supposed to be able to take a model architecture from today, scale it up 100x and get an improvement. I can’t make the settings in Crysis 100x higher than they can go.

      Games always have a limit, AI is supposed to get better with scale. Which part do you not understand?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        I’m supposed to be able to take a model architecture from today, scale it up 100x and get an improvement.

        You can make Crysis run at higher fps. You can add polygons. (remember ati clown feet?) You can add details to textures. https://research.nvidia.com/publication/2016-06_infinite-resolution-textures

        But really the “game” is the model. Throwing more hardware at the same model is like throwing more hardware at the same game.

        Which part of diminished returns not offering as much profit did you not understand?

        Current models give MS an extra 30% revenue. If they spend billions on a new model will customer pay even more? How much would you pay more for a marginally better AI?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 hour ago

          But really the “game” is the model. Throwing more hardware at the same model is like throwing more hardware at the same game.

          No, it’s not! AI models are supposed to scale. When you throw more hardware at them, they are supposed to develop new abilities. A game doesn’t get a new level because you’re increasing the resolution.

          At this point, you either have a fundamental misunderstanding of AI models, or you’re trolling.