He said speaking up during the address was the best way “get across to a person who uses his incivility, who uses his incivility against our civility.”

  • BigFig
    link
    fedilink
    English
    259
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Why didn’t every Democrat step forward and PHYSICALLY bar him from being removed. They just sat there and let him be ejected. STAND THE FUCK UP

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1402 days ago

      I thought the same thing. Then I thought about how powerful of a visual it would have been for each one of them, in turn, to cause a disruption and be escorted out. Let the cameras pan over a half filled chamber after 2 hours of meticulous protesting. That image would be in history books 100 years from now, assuming we all survive the next 4.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        201 day ago

        Trump is an old fart. He’s not going to stand up there for 6 hours speaking. If, one-by-one, every Democrat made a scene and got walked out they would’ve been there until midnight and Trump having gotten through almost none of his speech.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 hours ago

          they all dont want to be there, they just want to ride on the grift the gop started, and benfitting from the same donors.

    • don
      link
      fedilink
      532 days ago

      Because they’re weaker than wet tissue paper.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        352 days ago

        True, unless it comes to fighting progressives in their own party. Then they suddenly remember how to fight.

    • wildncrazyguy138
      link
      fedilink
      292 days ago

      Not saying I disagree with your premise.

      However, there are some strange brew rules that come into play depending on the #of reps in attendance in the house. You dwindle the dem #s enough and you end up allowing the reps the ability to run amok with the kinds of legislation they’re salivating to pass.

      I’m sure this was at top of mind for some of the folks in attendance.

      • BigFig
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 day ago

        Congressional rules are meaningless. They are not the constitution. If the Democrats are going to just sit idle because of “congressional rules” then they might as well start using the constitution as toilet paper

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You dwindle the dem #s enough and you end up allowing the reps the ability to run amok with the kinds of legislation they’re salivating to pass.

        That’s why there’s also quorum rules. There has to be a minimum of X% of the congresspeople present for anything to count and I’m 99.9% certain that all of the Dems leaving would bring the number present under that even if every single Republican was present.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 day ago

          Quorum is largely meaningless in Congress, both houses assume they have quorum at all times. This allows for the pro forma sessions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      222 days ago

      I kept waiting for it! For a moment, I had a swell of hope that they were going to force the Sargeant at Arms to remove them one by one, or else block Al from being removed, something, anything with a little fucking Chutzpah, but nope. They all just sat down, shut up, and waved their stupid little signs. Good job guys, I can’t wait to see your next fundraising text.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      162 days ago

      It reminded me, very randomly, of quote from a book about urban design and how architectural ideas are introduced and accepted by the public… or not.

      From this the “principle of the second man” can be formulated: it is the second man who determines whether the creation of the first man will be carried forward or destroyed…

      It was a golden chance and a room full of cowards let it slip.


      The book is Design of Cities by Edmund Bacon for anyone interested.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 day ago

          How’s that party whip taste? Sounds like you’d do well in an authoritarian one-party state as long as the party pretends to be in partial agreement with you.

          I hear Shanghai is lovely this time of year…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 day ago

      Even when they do something they’ll get criticized.

      Every. Single. Time.

      Nothing will ever be enough.

      • BigFig
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 day ago

        Are you blind? Or just intentionally dense. We are here, in this thread LITERALLY praising Al Green, a democrat, for DOING SOMETHING

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          I mean, the OP comment I’m responding to is questioning why every other Dem didn’t do the same so…are you just intentionally dense or…?

          Hence the part about “it won’t ever be enough.”

          Try reading before typing next time.

          Edit- down vote all you want. You know I’m right.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          218 hours ago

          Well that disappointing in itself. She should been there protesting and making our voices heard.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            212 hours ago

            Eh I’m fine with them not attending. Let him speak to a half empty chamber. Bonus points if they spend the time organizing or rallying elsewhere.

            The dude relies on you following rules of decorum while he himself breaks every single rule. Why should Democrats play his game? It’s extremely likely that it was mostly Republicans watching the thing anyway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        AOC talks a big game, but I’m not personally convinced she follows through.

        Case in point, this situation. There should have been more democrats doing the same thing.

        Why didn’t anyone do anything? They talk a big game on social media, but that’s it.

        I’m thinking they are either controlled opposition or too enthralled to corporate donations to do anything.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 day ago

      another armchair general calling for the dems to arm themselves and perform a revolution or else they’re nazi sympathizers

      this is what civil politics in a non banana republic looks like

      • BigFig
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 day ago

        No dumb fuck. You ever read a history book? Congress used to have literal fist fights.

        Defending yourselves from being ejected from your literal work place, a place YOUR constituents elected you to be at, by someone who is by not a single ounce of the definition, your boss, is not violence. It is not “arming” yourself, IT IS LITERALLY DOING WHAT YOUR OATH OF OFFICE STATES, TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED FUCKING STATES

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 day ago

          no need to shout i’m right here. i imagine you prefer to settle most things with your fists. specially politics

          • BigFig
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 day ago

            I suppose you’ll just lay down and die when they come for you. I grieve for your family and anyone who depends on you.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              i’ll kill em. but i still prefer my politicians to remain peaceful. that’s kinda what they’re for

              actually come to think of it, why didn’t you storm the capitol a month ago like your favourite politician did

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 day ago

        This is very not what civil politics look like unless of course one loves the taste of boot. Mmm boots.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 day ago

            Neither that nor am I showing deference to the wealthy traitors running roughshod over our government turning it into an authoritarian kleptocracy.

            There is a middle ground here in the real world.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 day ago

              and the dems not rioting was deference yes?

              someone shouting “they didn’t do enough” is contributing to progressive politics and saving us from trump

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                71 day ago

                Yes. Suggesting quiet civility in the face of complete disregard for your fellow countrymen is deference. A riot was not suggested. Standing up was.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 day ago

                  slicing the ham pretty thinly there but we’ve all got standards for our political theatre i guess

                  it’s the principle isn’t it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 day ago

      Is there a better representation of the american people who couldn’t be bothered voting in the first place??