• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 days ago

    Sure, but that’s not relevant at all to this post topic which is about a specific current event and not in any way suggesting storming out of votes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 days ago

      This specific current event happened in the chamber of congress while congress was in session. They could hold a vote at any moment.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          On the day of the joint session, 03/04, there were no less than 80 actions taken in congress and no less than 3 votes which passed in the House of Representatives LINK HERE. If you have evidence of a specific law preventing votes during a joint session, and specifying how long a joint session lasts at minimum, please present it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 days ago

        On live TV, with Trump standing up there, you think the Speaker of the House is just going to call a snap vote in a chamber they already control and resolve it before the missing members could get back to the chamber? And that such an act would just be accepted as a clever procedural move to avoid the handful of objections in their majority caucus rather than a significant step toward the end of democracy?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 days ago

          If enough people left the room I expect it, yes. It’s certainly what I would do in their position (thank god I’m not them).