• Doug Holland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1561 day ago

    Katie Porter is one of the very few good guys. She’d be a terrific governor for California, so I expect the Democratic Party will do all they can to oppose her.

    • andyburke
      link
      fedilink
      401 day ago

      If she isn’t the Dem nominee she should still run. I think we could put a progressive in here in CA.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        California has jungle primaries where the top two (usually both Democrats) go on to contest the general election iirc…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 hours ago

          I hate the top-two jungle primary. Damnit, if I want to vote for the person with no chance at winning, I shouldn’t have to write them in! I’d honestly much prefer to see some flavor of ranked choice vote implemented (not trying to kick off an argument about RCV flavors, just using it as a blanket term).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          523 hours ago

          It allows me to remain registered as a Republican but vote liberal every election. I just don’t know how you change affiliation at this point. And I don’t care after so long.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          123 hours ago

          Yep, one of the funnier end results seems to be the gradual recreation of the Progressive Republicans at least in my area. Though it should be noted they are still small and being actively ignored but the rest of the Republicans.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 day ago

      Harris is going to run and don’t you know this was her promised consolation prize. So sorry progressives, maybe in a 100 years when everyone in line in front of you dies?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 hours ago

        Yeah, I remember it being pitched right after the election. Idk, if Kamala actually runs on a progressive platform and doesn’t redshift like she did late in the election, I might consider her seriously.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 hours ago

          She’s incapable of running a progressive campaign. You have to actually be Progressive to do that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        423 hours ago

        Has she confirmed? I haven’t seen anything yet. Amy did well enough in the senate race. But she won’t beat Kamala if she runs. The power has shifted to NorCal/Bay area politicians to win elections.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          821 hours ago

          She hasn’t confirmed yet but that’s how the corporate political caste does things. They use the “soft announcement” to start testing messaging and campaign ideas. Then when they publicly decide they’re actually running they can denounce anything from before that.