Servais (il/le) to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish • 22 hours ago

What’s the strangest thing that’s ever happened to you that you still can’t explain?

60

What’s the strangest thing that’s ever happened to you that you still can’t explain?

Servais (il/le) to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish • 22 hours ago

Chat

grooving
link
fedilink
English
3•14 hours ago
This just happened to me. I can not fathom how they stole it with my big chain lock through the bike frame and the wall mount. Guess I’ll wait a few months for it to return. But I can’t explain how they took it.
- walden
  link
  fedilink
  English
  3•7 hours ago
  If I’ve learned anything from the Lockpicking Lawyer, it’s that most locks are pretty easy to defeat. Bike locks are just increase how long it takes to steal a bike.
- @[email protected]
  link
  fedilink
  English
  2•7 hours ago
  Chains are easy. A simple pair of bolt cutters can get through fairly thick chains. A parent of wiser care giver is often the reason they get returned.

Casual Conversation @lemm.ee

[email protected]

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.

RULES (updated 01/22/25)

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

478 users / day
1.53K users / week
2.57K users / month
7.07K users / 6 months
2.69K subscribers
768 Posts
16K Comments
Modlog