• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    919 hours ago

    Anything that’s not the state is civilian. That includes civilian property. And I, too, cheer on violence against the oppressive class.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1210 hours ago

      I don’t consider property destruction “violence”. Violence for me can only occur if there is a nervous system involved. Defining it otherwise seems a bit disingenuous, imo. Vandalism is not the same as an act against a person or animal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        38 hours ago

        If I break into your home and trash the place, it’s not violence? You should speak to people who experienced that. Granted, this is between real people and not corporations. And there is a line, somewhere, between vandalism and destruction where it turns to violence. It’s compIicated. I just completely disagree with the statement that destruction of property is never violence.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 hours ago

          They try to make it equivalent so they can classify people who smash windows in protest as “violent criminals” in order to increase the penalties which is a complete mischaracterization. If the act of vandalism has knock on effects then those are separate from the act itself and should be dealt with separately.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1716 hours ago

      Property is not people though.

      Otherwise shorting companies would also be terrorism.