• Sami
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        They can just phrase it a little differently and argue semantics in front of a bunch of 70 year olds who don’t know what a browser is in a hearing or two. Maybe a couple campaign contributions through completely legal channels and that’s that. Anti trust enforcement has been falling in the US for decades.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          I am cautiously optimistic of that new gal heading the FTC, she’s preparing suits I to Amazon and Google, so we’ll see how that goes

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              I know you’re joking, but it’s genuinely pathetic how much of a paper tiger the FTC is. The world we live in is one in which a company like Google can and will just tank the FTC fine and continue anti-consumer practices.

    • callyral
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      You could use an extension that changes your user agent but I’m not sure how well that’d work

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        They have control of Chrome, so they could always implement some kind of API into Chrome to check.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                Sure, but most people will still use Google Chrome, and good luck getting Microsoft and Opera to switch to the fork. Google will still have full control over Chrome, and the layperson won’t understand why a browser that looks the same as Chrome but doesn’t work with Google’s sites is better.

                That’s the issue.