• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    581 year ago

    I look at it this way: we reveal ourselves by how we treat our helpless opponents.

    Perfectly normal to have the emotional response of ‘serves her right.’ The better person has to stop, set the emotion aside, and ask whether the treatment fits their moral framework. If you can’t articulate why a transgendered friend, convicted of some crime, should be cross-housed, then this woman probably shouldn’t be, either.

    Feeling conflicted is good - it’s your rational brain fighting with your emotional brain and winning.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      We (LGBTQ) cant keep tolerating intolerance, or else we are going to end up without rights.

      “We have to be the better person”, “We reveal ourselves by how we treat our helpless opponents”, etc… until we end up shot dead like that woman that put up the rainbow flag.

      Fuck that.

      • hypelightfly
        link
        fedilink
        361 year ago

        Having her serve her sentence in the appropriate prison isn’t tolerating intolerance. She will still be convicted and be in prison for the duration of her sentence.

      • dreadgoat
        link
        fedilink
        341 year ago

        Nobody’s asking you to forgive her for what she’s done, we’re just saying that when your enemies are being raped and tortured, perhaps it would be good for you to say “hmm, can we achieve justice without all the rape and torture maybe?”

        • Hot Saucerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Truth. As much as I’d like to see these people have some epiphany moment of realizing how wrong they were to back people who would turn on them, they won’t. They deserve the better world we want for them, even if they are too much of a cantankerous bastard to ever be thankful for it.

          We need a better society that snuffs out such hateful movements before they capture vulnerable people. Because that is what these type of groups (read: cults) operate on, finding vulnerable, lonely people who need to feel like they are part of a group and need to feel like they have a purpose. They offer those things to the lost and broken, even when they know they will turn their own knives back on those they recruit, when the time comes. As we saw with COVID, even facing death won’t make them learn they backed the wrong horse, with many of them saying COVID was a hoax until their own rasping, COVID-infected dying breath.

          As cathartic letting those who get sucked into these cults suffer the punishment of their own hubris feels, they will learn nothing from it. Better to create a better world around their crappy selves.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          I have no sympathy for people that are electing people that want to take rights away from LGBTQ. I have had enough. Wish you all thought the same. Maybe when you are shot dead for having a rainbow flag in your door you will think the same.

          • BraveSirZaphod
            link
            fedilink
            211 year ago

            No one’s asking you to have sympathy. You’re being asked to ignore that base part of our monkey brains that delights in hurting the people we feel deserve it for its own sake when we’re talking about how to design fair and equitable systems of justice.

          • Hot Saucerman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I have no sympathy for them either, but this isn’t a genetics or upbringing thing, new broken people and new manipulative people will always be with us. There is no way to sever them from society other than resorting to the same authoritarian tactics that they use (such as murder), so it is much better to create a better society that makes their complaints about it seem as loony as they actually are. As long as there are broken people to prey on, there will be new manipulators who follow the script. For example, Donald Trump isn’t actually smart enough to understand he’s playing the fascist playbook, he knows it as the mob boss playbook combined with a life in which he has faced no punishment, so it stands to reason he really believes he deserves no punishment for anything he has done. He knows he did them, and just thinks they don’t count as criminal acts because he did them, and he is special. A lot of his choices have more to do with his own narcissism than they have to do with genuine fascism, they just end up appearing the same. His fascist followers and enablers, on the other hand…

            We can not have sympathy for them while also advocating for better prison conditions in which to lock them up. They still did wrong, they violated their own community, no less, but us resorting to their tactics means we’ve lost the plot, because removing our enemies from society will not suddenly make society better (or stop new people from doing the same things). We need to minimize the damage they can do, absolutely, but that can and should be done without resorting to outright removal from society. Rehabilitation may be impossible, but it should still be the goal.

      • DessertStorms
        link
        fedilink
        27
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Tolerating intolerance would be accepting that transgender people get put in the wrong prison.

        It’s literally tolerating intolerance.

        Doing it because the person in question happens to be a piece of shit, doesn’t make it any less tolerating of intolerance or somehow cancels it out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        221 year ago

        When her killer walks free, you can riot. I’m not asking for tolerance of intolerance; I’m asking you to treat humans like humans or to justify housing Chelsea Manning or Reality Winner in a men’s prison.

      • BraveSirZaphod
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        Imprisoning people in the correct facility is not “tolerating intolerance”, so I’m genuinely very confused how you think that’s relevant.

      • keeb420
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        we can have some sympathy. but at the same time im not gonna lose any sleep over this. what did this person think would happen to lgbtq+ people if trumps coup succeeded? republicans have shown for a long time who they are towards the lgbtq+ community. they’ve been specifically targeting transgender people since, at the latest, 2016 with all the bathroom crap.

        should she be in a womens prison, yes. but when you side with those that would put other transgender people in the wrong prison its hard to have much sympathy or empathy. its better to go high when they go low, sometimes you just need to kick them in the mouth when they go low. and this person is currently getting kicked in the mouth.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It doesn’t require any sympathy or empathy, nor does it require any level of siding with her.

          Either one believes that trans people should be treated equally before the law, or one does not. Ditto every other category of person. It is possible to have prisons which contain prisoners without exposing them to actual harm, and this should be true in every prison for every prisoner, no matter how heinous their actions.

          So though women’s prisons in the US are hardly free from both sexual and transphobic violence, nor men’s prisons safe environments for male prisoners, sending a woman to a men’s prison automatically makes her sentence far more onerous than that of her fellow insurrectionists found guilty of a similar level of behaviour but who are sent to prisons which match their gender. Remember; all of them are at least as supportive as she is of a party which endangers trans people.