• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    them obeying the atc command was reasonable and expected course of action.

    That’s incorrect, and is exactly why we train to ignore ATC commands and follow TCAS advisories. We don’t even tell ATC if we’re climbing or descending, simply “Aircraft XYZ, TCAS RA”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        According to the wiki…

        TCAS was a relatively new technology at the time of the accident, having been mandatory[Note 2] in Europe since 2000.

        Two years prior to the accident, in Europe, where the accident happened.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yours wasn’t a question, it was a statement, and a wrong one. TCAS adherence wasn’t fundamentally changed after the accident in question, but it brought to light it’s importance.

            So let’s come back to the original argument: following the erroneous instructions of atc over the TCAS resulted in the accident - if they had followed TCAS, like the DHL crew, they’d be alive.

            Edit: posted two answers by accident. Deleted one

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Hi actual pilot,

              Has other poster actually provided any evidence of or mentioned any qualifications to you? Because I think you’re arguing with a clueless idiot.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                yes, had they followed the tcas, the accident might have been avoided.

                There it is. I’m glad we could finally come to an agreement. Thanks for the entertainment.