Former President Donald Trump has replaced his top Georgia lawyer ahead of his surrender Thursday evening, sources tell CNN.

Drew Findling, the lawyer who has led Trump’s defense in Georgia, is being replaced by Steven Sadow, an Atlanta-based attorney whose website profile describes him as a “special counsel for white collar and high-profile defense.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4810 months ago

    No sure what the other lawyer had said but it looks like Trump just went with someone who says what he wants to hear.

    “I have been retained to represent President Trump in the Fulton County, Georgia case. The president should never have been indicted. He is innocent of all the charges brought against him,” Sadow said in a statement. “We look forward to the case being dismissed or, if necessary, an unbiased, open minded jury finding the president not guilty. Prosecutions intended to advance or serve the ambitions and careers of political opponents of the president have no place in our justice system.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4210 months ago

      “hopefully the case just goes away. But I guess I could try to somehow get a not guilty for him if we can stack the jury the Right way.”

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        3010 months ago

        "I just want some of that sweet Trump train money.

        What do you mean, get the invoice later?"

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1710 months ago

          But he doesn’t pay his bills. My guess is, the lawyer wanted the money up front for handling his bond and Trump said no way.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            510 months ago

            Findling is a self-proclaimed liberal whose prior social media posts criticizing Trump quickly drew media attention.

            The former guy didn’t like the optics of being represented by a liberal. Optics is everything for him.

              • @[email protected]
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                510 months ago

                I doubt he cares about politics, but he does care about his image so it’s plausible. I personally think it’s because he wants yes men, someone pitched an idea to him and his lawyer probably told him it’s a bad idea and he had to be replaced.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          That exposure is gonna backfire- this case is basically a slam dunk.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            God damn, do I want to live in the reality where bad press exists. Or have you not watched these exact assholes fail upwards for the last seven years?

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              fedilink
              210 months ago

              The reason it’s going to back fire is you know trump is going to throw them under the bus when there’s nobody else to toss.

              They’re going to fail, and trump is going to blame them. And he’s going to let the world know it.

            • girlfreddy
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              @mindbleach @FuglyDuck

              There’s a reason it took 2.5 years to bring charges, and it’s not that multiple prosecutors were sitting on their ass twiddling their thumbs.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            A slam dunk unless someone in the audience (a single juror) decides that nothing the prosecution can do will make it a slam dunk so nobody gets any points (not guilty). Metaphor got away from me but all it takes is one juror to lie his way into the box and refuse to vote guilty no matter what.

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Actually, that would be a mistrial.

              Which results in a second trial- in this case it would be with a new jury. There would be no reason to dismiss the case if only one hold out was present.

              And if it’s demonstrable that the juror lied- maybe by looking at social media- then they’re gonna get his with perjury.

    • realcaseyrollins
      link
      fedilink
      -7610 months ago

      I mean wasn’t his other lawyer arrested? I can see why he picked a new one. But who knows, Joe Biden’s allies might have this one arrested too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        55
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I know you think you’re riding the center here, but he committed a failed coup and is now facing the consequences. It’s tough to back the wrong horse but you gotta take your losses and move on.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          1110 months ago

          In the immortal words and probably only wise thing trump ever said “You lost! get over it.”

          Too bad he can’t take his own advice…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2210 months ago

        I honestly don’t think Joe Biden has any interest in what lawyer Trump has today or why.

        He probably has more relevant news to read. Did you know that Kim Kardashian once had a cover photo on a magazine that broke the internet?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Are you calling people that don’t try to overturn elections “Joe Biden’s allies”?

        I suppose they would be, huh.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1410 months ago

        All these criminals keep getting arrested… it must be a conspiracy!

        Please learn to live in reality. Please start caring what words mean.

      • Brudder Aaron
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        This is certainly a take… A silly take but still one nonetheless.

        Pro-Tip: Anything you hear out of the GOP’s mouth should be taken with a grain of salt and/or assume it’s a political ploy.