• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    581 year ago

    I tend to agree with you, but I also think it’s important to know how the “enemy” thinks and interpret the news. I don’t think we should lock ourselves up in echo bubbles only reading stuff we agree with.

    • Pisodeuorrior
      link
      fedilink
      39
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In theory I’d agree with you. I don’t mind reading of nuances or different opinions than mine.

      In general however, conservative media are worthless piece of shit embarrassments that I don’t want to waste time on.

      There’s a difference between discussing with sometime with a different opinion, and stopping in the middle of the road responding to every deranged, mentally challenged ignorant mean crack addict who yells their vision of the world from the top of a soap box.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 year ago

        Agreed. They don’t argue in good faith. Their goal is not honesty and truth. What’s the point in engaging with someone like that?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Arguing in good faith is the important part.

          As soon as I engage with someone not arguing in good faith, I leave. There’s just no point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Comparing Forbes to a deranged, mentally challenged crack addict isn’t very fair, whatever your opinion is on Forbes or crack addicts.

    • Chainweasel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      291 year ago

      We don’t need to post their blatant propaganda as if it were a reliable source in order to do that though.