stopthatgirl7 to Work [email protected] • 1 year agoCEOs of top 100 ‘low-wage’ US firms earn $601 for every $1 by worker, report findswww.theguardian.commessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1794file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1789external-linkCEOs of top 100 ‘low-wage’ US firms earn $601 for every $1 by worker, report findswww.theguardian.comstopthatgirl7 to Work [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square100fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
These companies paid their employees a median wage of $31,672 in 2022, while their CEOs took home an average $15.3m
minus-squareAnother Person linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoI’d be absolutely ecstatic for a 1:4 ratio.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-7•1 year agoThat’s just bringing down the top without helping anyone. Need to lift from the bottom instead
minus-squareAnother Person linkfedilinkEnglish14•1 year agoYou can also raise the bottom to make that ratio reach the top…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•1 year agoYou’re not really all that familiar with how ratios work are you lol
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-3•1 year agoSure I am. If employees made $90/hr the ratio would be significantly improved. It’s not the ratio that’s the actual problem here. You get that right?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 year ago That’s just bringing down the top without helping anyone. Need to lift from the bottom instead What in the fuck does “lifting from the bottom” mean to you if raising employee wages isn’t it. Lift from the bottom, pull from the top. The ratio is the actual problem here. You get that right?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-3•edit-21 year agoThey were talking about reducing ceo pay, which who cares? It’s the workers that need the boost. Go back to reddit you jerk
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•1 year agoReduce CEO pay… to increase worker pay Damn, that was hard.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoRaising wages isn’t a boost? The hell are you talking about
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•1 year agoYou need some reading lessons. MAYBE THIS WILL HELP? THE GUY SAID CEO PAY IS TOO HIGH. WHO GIVES A FUCK AS LONG AS WORKERS EARN ENOUGH MONEY?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoLol you’re trolling right? CEO pay/4 > CEO pay/200 You get that right?
I’d be absolutely ecstatic for a 1:4 ratio.
That’s just bringing down the top without helping anyone. Need to lift from the bottom instead
You can also raise the bottom to make that ratio reach the top…
You’re not really all that familiar with how ratios work are you lol
Sure I am. If employees made $90/hr the ratio would be significantly improved. It’s not the ratio that’s the actual problem here. You get that right?
What in the fuck does “lifting from the bottom” mean to you if raising employee wages isn’t it.
Lift from the bottom, pull from the top. The ratio is the actual problem here. You get that right?
They were talking about reducing ceo pay, which who cares? It’s the workers that need the boost. Go back to reddit you jerk
Reduce CEO pay… to increase worker pay
Damn, that was hard.
Raising wages isn’t a boost? The hell are you talking about
You need some reading lessons. MAYBE THIS WILL HELP?
THE GUY SAID CEO PAY IS TOO HIGH. WHO GIVES A FUCK AS LONG AS WORKERS EARN ENOUGH MONEY?
Lol you’re trolling right?
CEO pay/4 > CEO pay/200
You get that right?