alphacyberranger to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agoIts not wrong thoughlemmy.worldmessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up1902
arrow-up1819imageIts not wrong thoughlemmy.worldalphacyberranger to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square133fedilink
minus-squarenewIdentitylinkfedilink13•1 year agoA decompiler won’t give you the source code. Just some code that might not even necessarily work when compiled back.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•1 year agoFrom the point of view of the decompiler machine code is indeed the source code though
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-2•1 year agoAnd? Decompilers aren’t for noobs. So what if it gives you variable and function names like A000, A001, etc? It can still lead a seasoned programmer where to go in the raw machine code to mod some things.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-7•1 year agoYou’re actually chatting with a hacker that made No-CD hacks.
A decompiler won’t give you the source code. Just some code that might not even necessarily work when compiled back.
From the point of view of the decompiler machine code is indeed the source code though
And? Decompilers aren’t for noobs. So what if it gives you variable and function names like A000, A001, etc?
It can still lead a seasoned programmer where to go in the raw machine code to mod some things.
You’re actually chatting with a hacker that made No-CD hacks.