Bethesda’s latest can’t help but feel shallow by comparison.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 year ago

    I’m enjoying Starfield far more than I expected.

    That said the NPC interactions are incredibly sterile in comparison to the full mo-capped acting of the BG3 NPCs. The Starfield NPCs feel like mannequins just spitting out their lines.

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s like 75% of the work for BG3. There’s absolutely some work implementing DnD mechanics into code and designing encounters, and obviously the assets for the world have to be created as well, but the vast majority of their time was spent on dialogue choices and designing the story in general.

      It’s a great game for it, but we’re a good ways away from being able to do the same in an FPS/TPS with real time combat that isn’t absolutely brutal. BG3 could be what it was in terms of interactions because it was a CRPG. But it had to be a CRPG to do it. ARPG isn’t the term for what Starfield is, but games with reasonably rewarding action take too much work on that element to invest the time into every encounter that BG3 does. Balancing probabilities and maps for encounters for a CRPG isn’t trivial, but it costs way less to do than building out all those mechanics and skill trees into real time physics.

      They’re different games with different goals.

    • Endorkend
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      The writing of BG3, both storyline and interpersonal for every NPC, is top tier.

      In Starfield, it’s like they put together a committee of pretentious artsy fartsy people who think that their Tumblr page makes them writers and a bunch of execs.

      And anything that combination of creatively dead asswipes came up with was canon.

      It’s a combination of trying to hard to be clever with the most derivative shite story I’ve seen in a long ass time.

      Starfield would be a better game without its main story.

      If it was allowed to put all the focus on being someone in this games universe, it would be far better than any elements of the main story existing in the games universe.

      Joining Constellation or not should also be an option.

      And Constellation should’ve been more of a JRPG style guild with people focusing on various branches of enterprise in the game and giving missions for those. A questhub rather than this club. They all already have their own specialization.

      But seriously, the main story is just all levels of meh.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Starfield falls into the classic Bethesda problem of here’s your story, go do it, also here’s a bunch of unrelated side quests.

        Also feel free to murder literally everyone you come into contact with it probably won’t matter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -61 year ago

      I mean, BG3 is an incredibly well-crafted and focused RPG, but you cannot in good faith compare it to a game with orders of magnitude more NPCs and voice lines, they’re simply not comparable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Quality, not quantity.

        I cant speak to the qualiry of starfield, but i do t think the teo games should be compared.

        Bg3 is extremely story driven and incredibly immersive with detailed and intricate combatz catering to many different playstyles in an almost sandbox format.

        Starfield is a vast exploration and semi combat focused rpg. Relying more on managment of inventory, crafting and development of kit.

        Personally its not my style, skyrim was great but i always got bored way before completing it so i dont think im gonna enjoy starfield.