@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoX updates its Terms to prohibit crawling/scraping of its datastackdiary.commessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1361file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1340external-linkX updates its Terms to prohibit crawling/scraping of its datastackdiary.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square48fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•1 year agoIt didn’t have to be illegal for them to sue you for violating its policies. It would be a civil suit for damages.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish18•1 year agoLol, then they would have to demonstrate that there were damages. The worst a TOS violation will get you is a ban.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoIt’s still a billionaire suing you for those peanuts.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoUnfortunately, they have more money to blow on legal fees. The threat of a suit is enough to keep most perks from fucking around and finding out.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoWould it be violating policy if the scrapper only took the public data and never actually signed the ToS since they didn’t make an account?
It didn’t have to be illegal for them to sue you for violating its policies. It would be a civil suit for damages.
Lol, then they would have to demonstrate that there were damages. The worst a TOS violation will get you is a ban.
Bandwidth costs.
Peanuts.
It’s still a billionaire suing you for those peanuts.
Suing for 50 dollar or so? Fine.
Unfortunately, they have more money to blow on legal fees. The threat of a suit is enough to keep most perks from fucking around and finding out.
Would it be violating policy if the scrapper only took the public data and never actually signed the ToS since they didn’t make an account?