• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Yeah I guess I just started to stop caring about socialism when I realized my country can’t even supply people with affordable housing. If public transport is such a net benefit, fund it privately.

    What I find silly is thinking you’re owed something from your peers.

    • Jim
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I think you’re failing to take into account that literally everyone who works and takes part in our society pays taxes.

      Paying taxes and asking municipalities for infrastructure to be built with those taxes ≠ “thinking you’re owed something from your peers”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I think you’re failing to take into account that literally everyone who works and takes part in our society pays taxes.

        No I’m aware people pay taxes.

        Paying taxes and asking municipalities for infrastructure to be built with those taxes ≠ “thinking you’re owed something from your peers”

        So let’s split the taxes! Boom.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Some questions (some are a bit polemic but I kinda wanna find common ground in the end):
      Do you drive on roads that you didn’t pave yourself?
      Do you maintain them yourself - if not, do you expect them to be generally connecting you to other places?
      Do you use the public power grid?
      Do you depend on water lines?
      Have you ever taken a flight from a city’s main airport?
      Have you served, or support the military?

      Do you consider any of these being publicly funded “socialism” or “demanding something of your peers”?

      In general, the way things work in my home country - the district / city / county / state / federal government have funds to maintain things on their corresponding scale (ascending local to federal) that are deemed either publicly beneficial or even essential.
      None of that is socialism, but in our case a “social democracy” i.e. making sure the bare, liveable minimum of life in this society functions through tax money and the federal budget in general.

      So to me it looks… weirdly disconnected to call any of these things “thinking you’re owed something from your peers”, just because one of these individual pieces might not be immediately relevant to your day to day routine.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Do you consider any of these being publicly funded “socialism” or “demanding something of your peers”?

        Yes.

        So to me it looks… weirdly disconnected to call any of these things “thinking you’re owed something from your peers”, just because one of these individual pieces might not be immediately relevant to your day to day routine.

        I wouldn’t consider my position “weirdly disconnected”. You could use your argument for anything. “What do you mean you don’t support public strip clubs? You use public roads don’t you?”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I have never in my life seen a publicly owned strip club or heard of governmental strip club subsidisations.

          Is that a US thing?

          A national or international rail network makes long distance travel safer, faster, more affordable, more sustainable and by those factors incredibly more accessible to lower income citizens.

          You pay taxes regardless, wouldn’t you want them to go towards something that benefits you and your peers?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I have never in my life seen a publicly owned strip club or heard of governmental strip club subsidisations.

            You don’t get the point of what I’m saying? You don’t understand analogies?

            A national or international rail network makes long distance travel safer, faster, more affordable, more sustainable and by those factors incredibly more accessible to lower income citizens.

            Is this a commerical or a reply?

            You pay taxes regardless, wouldn’t you want them to go towards something that benefits you and your peers?

            Not in this circumstance.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Analogies usually relate to the topic i guess.

              Not a commercial, didn’t know stating facts relevant to the discussion is frowned upon in your circles.

              Guess we’re done here, if you don’t like to discuss anything, maybe just don’t reply next time.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Analogies usually relate to the topic i guess.

                My analogy wasn’t deep. If you don’t understand how it relates to the topic 🤷‍♀️

                Not a commercial, didn’t know stating facts relevant to the discussion is frowned upon in your circles.

                Guess we’re done here, if you don’t like to discuss anything, maybe just don’t reply next time.

                Im perfectly happy with my replies.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  you just seem so upset at me listing the benefits of a concept as basic as public transport without ever mentioning anything other than “but communism” and “irrelevant other thing should not be publicly funded so neither should this” :'D

                  Like sorry that it works in most of the western world

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Once again you really don’t seem to understand. If all you want to do is deflect, dismiss, and reframe what I’m saying without actually engaging with the points I’ve made that’s not a discussion, that’s just you pontificating. By all means that’s your choice, but I’m going to respond to it as such.

                    you just seem so upset at me.

                    You shouldn’t be inferring tone.

                    like sorry that it works in most of the western world.

                    Not your best slogan yet.