• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -111 year ago

    There is a coast guard where the titanic sank but not where the immigrant ship sank near greece?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I don’t know many details on the loss there so I do not know if they were able to be saved or if they would have been assumed dead before the coast guard could have responded. Maybe the coast guard there just doesn’t care?

          Can’t really compare either of these situation because they differ too much. Ask the Greek coast guard why they didn’t make an effort.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            There’s a Sea Shepherd ship captain facing twenty years in an Italian prison because she rescued drowning migrants. Because, in government terms, she smuggled aliens into Italy.

            And she’s just one of the most well known cases in the West. A fisherman in Greece got 280 years in prison for piloting a single ship of migrants to shore.

            Saying the governments of Italy, Greece, Turkey, etc, don’t care about migrant lives understates the situation. They want migrants to die at sea, and they punish people who bring them to land.

    • @PlushySD
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Your logic is weird

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Maybe ignorant, idk. But it baffles me that 5 people doing something stupid in international water get a massive rescue yet a boat trying to find a place to dock with hundreds of people does not.

        Though by know i have heard mixed info that there where some rescue attempts but also that some captain supposedly got fines for trying to rescue.

        • @PlushySD
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          My point of view is the billionaires were doing something stupid and that’s the point. People love that. That’s why there is so much media coverage. And there are so many bad things happening right now, why do people have to pick one and then hey, why don’t you look at this!??! It’s not that it’s not bad; it’s a bad thing that needs attention, and that’s I accepted. But it’s not as fun as looking at billionaires doing something stupid, right?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Your argument for an immoral mismanaging of funds by the world politics is it generates clicks?

            The media is ti blame to frame it as a funny thing rather then a display of classcism showing that if you are rich enough armyswill try to rescue you no matter what you did.

            We can laugh about it but we are just the internet and humor is a way to cope.

            • @PlushySD
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              I see your point, and I am not arguing with it. But if you ask why they are not covering the bad things or the more concerning things? The answer, as you just said it’s not generating clicks. They will cover the things we should know from time to time, but when a very juicy hot funny topic is out there, they gonna cover that first.